19. The Bookworm…

FOREWORD

26th of September 2015...

I have tonight a contemporaneous account of a real pervert facing real justice in this very parish...  Something of a contrast to the often-decades-old regurgitated guff you'll find elsewhere, authored by Malcolm 'Con-man' Ogilvy... A unwashed Stoner/Waster deemed too dangerous to even be allowed to see his own flesh and blood... 

Such creatures having little genuine concern for seeing justice meted out to real perverts, the very real story of openly, rabidly-Loyalist and Masonic (odd for a man supposedly from a 'Catholic' family) pervert Hugh 'Mitch' Mitchell of Kirknewton is noticeably absent from Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy's site...  Despite the fact it's the tale of a well-connected Mason with an ex-services background against whom suspicions were first voiced almost twenty years ago; and about whom the authorities did nothing, except cover-up for him...

Malky has nothing to say on the subject. - I wonder why that is?

********

It must have been late 1996 or early 1997 when I first met Hugh "Mitch" Mitchell…  My daughter was just months old. We were thrown together in a project for a major broadcaster, Mitch being, supposedly, an ex-SSVC (Services Sound and Vision Corporation) Cameraman and ex-army.  All the gear but little idea was my overriding impression of Mitch. Like most freelancers, he worked from home, with an edit suite in his spare (front) bedroom in the modest three-bedroom ex-army semi-detached house he occupied with his wife Gill. - In a fairly expensive and exclusive village just a mile or two from the Edinburgh city boundary.  – Kirknewton.  

I'm quite prepared to name and shame Gill Mitchell MBE in this piece because I am convinced she must have known what her husband was. She was (is?) a strange, bland looking, English-sounding creature… About a decade his junior, 'dressed like her Mother type' quite cold and unfriendly; though rather 'polished' in demeanour and quite incongruous with the diminutive scruffy Mitch with his rotten teeth and unkempt hair – the latter often a feature of those who had endured crew-cut years in the services; as if they were making up for lost time.

The Mitchell household was 'odd'… One had the feeling he was always in the dog-house; and signs abounded that he often slept in his edit suite!  They had no children – which is probably as well… And they were no normal loving couple; some in the village imagining them to be Brother and Sister… Or a 'lavender marriage'... Or for some other convenience...

I had the feeling Mitch was being thrown commissions largely off the 'debt' some might have perceived the country owed him as an ex-serviceman. He certainly wasn't much of a cameraman nor editor nor much of anything else. A dozen years my elder, after the Army he had, apparently attended an HNC course in video production at Stevenson College in Edinburgh - and there were his claims to have worked at SSVC; I saw little to convince me I was working with a peer. 

But business is business; and we were often assigned to the same events. And clearly, from his array of brand-new broadcast video equipment, he had money to invest.

I worked with Mitch for about eighteen months, mainly on a joint project to secure the 'Restricted Service License' (RSL) for West Lothian… A license to broadcast a local TV channel from an office near The Regal Community Theatre in Bathgate. – This was in the days of analogue television; and the bid involved seeking the approval of the ITC with a view to being allocated space on the broadcast spectrum.  Mitchell was supposed to contribute some £15,000 of the initial £30,000 estimated costs – funds he claimed to have tied up in shares which would take time to release. Suffice to say that the whole of the investment remained mine, as Mitchell simply did not come up with the cash, only excuse after excuse after excuse…   I was most aggrieved since to raise that sort of cash my wife and I – and our young baby – had to make some very serious sacrifices; all the time while Mitch lived in relative affluence.

And this was par for the course… SSVC isn't known for employing incompetents, and although Mitchell was somewhere around a dozen years my senior, he clearly just hadn't been the places or done the things he claimed and had nowhere-near my level of knowledge or experience despite his 'bigshot' claims.  The penny took a while to drop; but it became apparent that Hugh 'Mitch' Mitchell was something of a fantasist…

He'd tried (for instance) to push bullshit claims about his education (sounds familiar?); claiming to have attended a highly-regarded private school in Glasgow. In fact he was a dumb-ass barely-literate early-leaver from one of the roughest schools in North Glasgow; caught out of all people by my own Mother, who has as a young girl lived in the same part of town as his family; and knew them for the rogues they were and knew what a dunce he - the 'baby' of the family - really was... 

He was an openly racist letch too...

Next door to his house was a bungalow occupied by a black woman and her daughters, some of whom, in the mid-90s were very young; the woman was an Army widow I believe, quiet, respectable and trying to get along as best she could...  From his first-floor eyrie with its end of the cul-de-sac view of the street he'd letch inappropriately at the girls of that family; peering into their garden, uttering obscenities that were all of unnerving, inappropriate and essentially racist…  On more than one occasion I told him to shut the fuck up and that his 'attitude' just wasn't appropriate or acceptable; it didn't change him!  

One or two incidents really rang alarm bells with me in mid-1998. Mitchell's guard was coming down; and I recall one particular sunny spring day filming in Almondell Country Park when he simply 'disappeared' for half-an-hour.  He was eventually spotted at an odd spot on the river where he could be unseen watching some very young teenage girls frolicking in the water. – 

People weren't happy. People were unnerved. People were angry...

I guess the last straw for me came when Mitchell actually admitted that he'd been asked not to return to the job as a temporary audio-visual technician at St Margaret's Academy in Livingston...   I caught him one day sitting in his edit suite inexplicably reviewing shoddy footage he had shot at the school of some girls in their early-mid teens rehearsing a dance-piece… He confessed that he'd 'had to go' as some of the girls were 'too hot'. - These were children he was drooling over; and he seemed not to nderstand just how far out of order he was...

The following day Mitchell received my notice removing him from the RSL project… My 'legal excuse' for breaking the contract was his failure to come up with his stake money. In reality, I was glad to be rid of the dirty little creep.  I did, after all, have a young female child at home.  And quite clearly there was obviously  'something far wrong' with Hugh Mitchell… 

My concerns were passed to the Police at the time… I questioned why, when he had clearly been asked to leave St Margaret's because of his predilection towards young girls, had he not faced consequences? Why was he not being monitored? Why was he apparently able to go about his business as if he were any other citizen? How did he get issued with a Press Pass?  - I'm still waiting on answers.

Hugh Mitchell – like quite a few other people – has been on the radar ever-since…

At Livingston Sheriff Court yesterday, Mitchell pleaded guilty to seven counts of lewd, indecent and libidinous practices and one charge of rape.  He admitted that between September 1988 and April 2004, he sexually assaulted five girls aged between five and fifteen years of age.  Clearly, had alarm bells not rang, and had I not ended the business relationship, and that man continued to move in my circles, there is a fair chance my own daughter could have been one of his victims…

Glad as I am to see the bastard jailed at last I still have questions…  Just as was the case in Addiewell when I tried to expose what was going on there, the concerns I raised about Hugh Mitchell were dismissed by the Police…  It took over a dozen years before I saw Addiewell's Ian Samson convicted and here we are some seventeen years on from when I first raised the alarm about Mitchell…  

 And I won't have been the only one! 

I recall for instance meeting Mitchell one day on the 'back road' leading out of Kirknewton about four years ago… He was 'black and blue' having obviously received a recent beating.  His 'story' was that he had been filming a piece for ITN and been beaten up on duty – it happens!  Trouble is that ITN hadn't hired him since the late 90s and even then only once.   We can only speculate as to who gave him a kicking and why – like Sgt Schultz 'I know nothing'.  

But there's more…

Many will be aware of my contention that the truth of the Hollie Greig case actually links to the trade in extreme pornography.  And I am happy to express the view that the extreme efforts to deflect from that truth – and in particular the nature-in-trade of certain individuals central to that deflection -  is bound by a common-thread of extreme pornographic material, including images and prose relating to child abuse… 

It's a curious co-incidence that – just like certain of the individuals implicated in Hollie Greig's probable abuse – Mitch Mitchell owned a vast array of video equipment for which he had little or no legitimate use.  - And he is known, latterly, to have originated obscene material; some of which was cited at his trial.  

What was his 'market' for such filth?  

Even more curious is Mitchell's authorship of a book entitled '"Holiday".  – The depraved story of how a young child had been taught how to 'make love' by a character named “Mitch” during a holiday to Scotland. This filth was written in the person of the young girl herself, and describes in graphic detail how she was raped in a swimming pool changing cubicle at the Bubbles Leisure Pool in Livingston and of abuse in Almondell Country Park – the very same place he had wandered off from his work years earlier to leer at young girls playing in the river …

What market is there for something that seeks to circumvent the law on making or using images of child abuse?  How does such material get distributed?  And by whom?

Perhaps we might reasonably speculate that certain 'specialist book dealers' might know? Although Mitchell is no 'Walt' in the sense that he actually did serve with the Royal Highland Fusiliers and was a Bandsman; there remains that common 'military' ground...  And the fact he is a fantasist. Curiously too, Mitch Mitchell is a self-professed 'cancer victim'; claiming to have received treatment for (fully deserved in my opinion) Prostate Cancer...    Of which he is now 'clear'! Isn't it magical how these perverts seem to routinely survive that which so often kills normal men?  

And as for their trade... One wonders how these well-connected Masonic 'types' get away with it for so long; for there is no doubt the Police knew about him....

And there is worse… The Daily Record originally reported back in 2009...

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/local-news/charity-worker-gobsmacked-mbe-award-2609939

" A DEDICATED charity worker has said she is “gobsmacked” after being awarded an MBE in the Queen’s Birthday Honours. Gill Mitchell (53) of Kirknewton, is set to receive the accolade for her 11 years’ work with Simpsons Special Care Babies."

For Clarity, Gill Mitchell received her MBE in 2009....

More on this remarkable achievement, and a photograph of her,  can be found here…

http://www.sscb.org/site/sscb_news.htm

It must have been very nice for Gill Mitchell MBE to receive her, frankly inexplicable, award from Prince Charles at Buckingham Palace... I guess that's what 'connections' do for you! And from her comment, how much she thinks of the children at the Simpsons Special Care Baby Unit in Edinburgh…  A little baffling that this bland, unremarkable creature should be so singled-out. Truly; what great connections she must have...

It's a pity she wasn't quite-so 'concerned for the children' when, in around 2005 she found her husband's work of filth - "Holiday"!  – For it emerged at his trial that she had found his 'book' a decade previously, and deliberately chosen not to make a statement to Police about it – her conscience only 'getting the better of her' about six weeks ago at the end of July 2015.

Similarly, she would appear to have chosen to live with the filthy wretch for close to two decades that I know of…  And, in my opinion, in the full knowledge of what kind of depraved beast she shared a house and name with. 

I'd suggest to Gill Mitchell MBE that, if she hopes to retain a shred of dignity, has any shred of decency or honour, she should send her 'gong' back without delay; and withdraw herself from all involvement in any organisation that deals with children in any way shape or form. - You covered-up for a bloody child-raping pervert Gill! You stood-by and said nothing while your husband raped little girls; and I'm as sure as I can be that you knew damned-well what he was like twenty years ago...    

It's also a pity that Lothian and Borders Police chose to disregard the concerns I raised about Mitchell in 1998.  And that St Margaret's Academy in Livingston would appear to have swept his predilection for little girls under the carpet back in around 1996…  At least six or eight years of suffering on the part of his victims could have been avoided. 

Hugh Mitchell - The Kirknewton Nonce - will, at last (we hope!) be seeing the inside of a jail cell on the 22nd of October when he appears at the High Court for sentencing!

Ian Samson...

Alistair Stewart...

Hugh 'Mitch' Mitchell...

Who's next on my list?  - Tick Tock!

 

 

18. Repeat the lie again… As often as you like.

A lie remains, just a lie...  No matter how often it is repeated. 

"Siding with Nonces"? - Only those who promote deliberate lies that deflect from the truth of sex abuse cases can be said to be doing that...  The truth is the truth, and facts are facts - no matter how inconvenient...  Factually, Robert Green has proven himself to be a dishonest man with an agenda that is not in Hollie's interests, but his own…  Through his actions the grain of truth to the Hollie Greig case has - as Mark Daly observed - been washed away in a tide of nonsense...  Siding with Nonces indeed; by ensuring they become even more untouchable! That is the consequence of what Robert Green has done! 

For those with no legitimate claim to stake in the media, fame on the Conspiritainment circuit can be highly lucrative. – Whether that be through Icke's style of quackery, McKenzie's method of running fund-raising scams or some other means of becoming a 'big fish' in the smelly little pond of conspiracy theory. This seems to have been Green's direction…

Factually, when Anne Greig happened along with her embroidered fantasies about high level paedophile rings, the former bankrupt, whose travel-agency business had crashed and burned partly due to his own incompetence – along with his relationship – was alone, on his uppers and trying to re-create himself as a 'Journalist and Broadcaster' through the rather hapless medium  of volunteer local radio. In reality, Robert Green has absolutely no kind of training or qualification in any aspect of journalism or broadcasting – and no substantial experience either.  Nor for that matter has he any training, formal or otherwise, in law. – Which makes rather ridiculous his claims to be a "Lay Legal Advisor"; a mantle donned by him through much of his travels. 

Failed husband, failed businessman, 'Walter Mitty', wannabe-Journalist… All charges that Green's supporters project baselessly onto others to try and deflect attention from their own hero's failings; classically so in fact. – But factually, they describe Robert Green perfectly!  

As for the word "nonce" projected by an individual who factually is  himself  a convicted felon....Baseless projections like this are merely stones from the most fragile of glass houses designed to deflect from the facts I and others present - which you, dear reader are invited to cross-check for yourself... 

One of the problems with stupid people is that they very-often suppose the rest of the world is just as stupid as themselves.   And the truth is, it seems inconvenient for a man who - indulging in behaviour that is nothing short of child-abuse - robbed his own daughter of her innocence by filling her head with the filth generated in his own head...

You see... In a pre-echo of the Hampstead Hoax, Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy attempted to frame his child's mother's family by filming the wee girl 'parroting' filthy accusations of his own creation into a mobile 'phone. Ogilvy wasn't bright enough to realise however that when a file is deleted from such a device the file itself doesn't disappear - only the reference to it.  Once Ogilvy had a 'good take' he called the police. - Unfortunately for him, a skilled examination  of the telephone revealed all the 'bad takes' of him coaching the child, and he was caught out in his deception. 

He was fortunate not to face criminal charges for that deception, but bleats long and loud at the authorities for rounding to protect his daughter from him...

Filling a little girl's head with the perverted filth from inside his weed-addled head is, by any reasonable measure, child abuse.  Robbing a child of her innocence simply to wreak freakish revenge on those had caught onto him and his dysfunctional ways is perverted. - God knows where this monster would have stopped in his efforts to fabricate 'evidence' against people who are guilty of nothing more than wanting normality for their Grandchild...

So factually - and this is supported by the nonsense Ogilvy himself has posted online - this is a man who was caught-out in his deception; and deemed to be such a danger to the moral wellbeing of his daughter that the authorities moved to ensure she could be endangered by him no more...  The authorities had no need to make him 'look like a criminal' - for he is, as is evidenced by other material he has posted online - a man with a criminal record for drug offences...  Like Greg Lance-Watkins trying to convince the world of the triviality of his firearms convictions; his past is disturbing and non-trivial...

A failed father if ever there was one!  As I have observed before; at least Greg Lance-Watkins only abandoned his daughter - Ogilvy robbed his of her innocence.

Damned right I have no history of criminal behaviour - not so much as a parking ticket - nor do I have any history of drug abuse.  - This will I suppose seem 'strange' to those dysfunctional creatures for whom 'normality' is lurching between Giro and street-corner dealer.  It may also surprise them to note than most normal people do get through life without criminal records. Factually no business of mine has ever failed...  And if you'd like to project blame on me for the accidental death of my fiancee in a road accident - which happened literally thousands of miles from my location at the time - then that speaks more of your warped mental state than any kind of fact or reality... 

Straw-man notions do not change the facts either... Especially when they're put forward by individuals for whom the term "nonce"  actually is a good fit.  - Hoisted by their own petard and the stupidity of their own admissions which indicate clearly what dysfunctional lives they lead.  

No matter how often his pet Ned repeats the lie, and regurgitates half-decade-old tripe from discredited rags; Robert Green is a proven liar... The documentrary evidence, with which he tried to deceive the public proves it, clearly, beyond any shadow of doubt. Robert Green manufactured a deliberate lie to try and implicate and damage Alex Salmond and the SNP...  

Why? -  When all the time his mistreatment was down to a Labour-appointed cuckoo in the nest - Elish Angiolini, over whom Salmond had no control...  

Factually you see, the Lord Advocate is beyond the control of the First Minister; they are appointed by the Queen on the recommendation of the First Minister...  An unelected Minister in the Scottish Government; up until the SNP took over the appointment was in the gift - and drawn from the ranks of - the ruling party. A practice actually ended by Salmond. The truth is  Elish Angiolini was very-much Jack McConnel's 'cuckoo'... Neatly slipped into post by an outgoing Labour Administration to an SNP government that had vowed to de-politicise the post...  

That IS the simple truth;  these are cold hard facts which anyone with any legal training will have learned in their first-principles education in Scots law. They're coupled to matters of recorded history that you can research for yourself in the country's official archives - as opposed to just taking the word of some random internet page...  - Especially one written by a rabid drug-abusing bigot with links to a Masonic-based group the entire existence of which is dedicated to Anti-Catholic hatred. A group that has harboured many of Scotland's very worst child sex-offenders, and celebrates its links to organisations like the KKK! 

The truth is that FAR from 'the FOI' 'proving' any misconduct on the part of the Scottish Government; the commissioner's response actually confirms that Robert Green lied and  attempted to mislead the public...  All the Scottish Government (Which isn't and never was 'Alex Salmond') are 'proven guilty' of is possible clerical incompetence on the part of some junior Civil Servant - and that largely as the result of Green's duplicitous - some might say unhinged - actions... 

The highly dubious, virtual rag  "The Firm" - under the discredited 'Red Cloud' of Steven Raeburn printed this load of incompetent shite because, quite clearly, it fitted in with its editor's personal agenda.  For clarity and the avoidance of doubt, Red Cloud Media were struck off the register of companies for non-compliance...  That simply isn't something that happens to credible, properly-run businesses - yet this is what Green's minions deem to be 'respected'...  

That quite apart from this rubbish being half-a-decade old and misleadingly presented by those so dishonest as to promote this tripe with its date redacted so as to make it appear current...   Disproved, discredited, struck off and just plain dishonest! 

And for clarity. - Just as Janner's alleged dementia does not absolve him from responsibility for his past crimes, and Greg Lance-Watkins alleged cancer excuses nothing of his actions, Stephen Raeburn's recent announcement that he has contracted the disease does not automatically promote his past material from grossly incompetent.  His fate is not one I would wish on anyone and I do hope to read of his recovery. - But in terms of him having in the past published complete and utter tripe, got into bother with the PCC and had his company 'struck off' - it is irrelevant  Far from being a 'top legal journalist' he remains an embarassing fop!
 

It's bizarre - and telling - that just before Green last went to court, he was singing the praises of Scottish Labour... 

The very party that gave us (among a plethora of other freaks and perverts)  'Dogger Mathieson' who himself replaced a man disgraced as a Gay-Gangster's Moll that spent his time in Castle Greyskull (Glasgow City Chambers) hepped up on Coke...  The branch-office of a party firmly entrenched with the filth of Westminster's peadophillia culture - Which was soundly trounced at the polls in Scotland.  

Green acted as mouthpiece for the very party that jailed him...  

So who was pulling Green's strings? - Frankly anyone who'll give him money and attention!

It's true that in retrospect, it looks very much like Green was a planted political-martyr - To a cause that history now proves to be a failure. But why? Who was funding him? Or what was he promised?  - With his 'handler' McKenzie now ousted, who's working him now?  Was he a political plant from day one; or did he just accept a pay-off to become a sock-puppet? 

For what it's worth no - I personally don't agree that Green was a political shill from day one.  Green is in my opinion just an attention-seeking con man. And will 'latch on' to anyone or anything that sates his appetite for fame.  - There is no doubt that various opportunists latched-on to the Hollie Greig case; most hoping to make money out of it, some trying to draw the 'heat' away from the case and some with political motives. - But the driving force behind the con has changed many times; and Green is clearly 'anybody's' for a few quid...

The political sock-puppetry of Robert Green has been a feature of his operation for quite some time it's true; we can only wonder who bought him and for how many pieces of silver... 

But in all respects that actually matter all that is irrelevant...  

Robert Green and his wasted druggie, low-life mates sold Hollie Greig down the river.  And that is readily illustrated by the exposure of Green's lie about Alex Salmond...  

And frankly it would be the same whoever they had lied about.  Green and his minions have sought to make the Hollie Greig case all about gaining political leverage...  And in order to achieve that, they have abandoned the truth for cheap, shoddy, infantile lies.

Robert Green abandoned the truth...  Long since!

And that is the only thing which is relevant -  Robert Green betrayed the truth. Robert Green betrayed a helpless sex-abuse victim for the sake of what exactly? Fame? Fortune? The sake of his beloved party?  

The 'book' on Hollie Grieg may well be closed – but that does not mean it is any less a work of reference…   Or that it won't be updated as and when...  A concept perhaps lost on certain non-educated-delinquents. 

Without fear, without favour, and regardless of cost. I'm NOT going away! You may not see me, you may not hear me, but I'll be around...  And no, poor Hollie won't be forgotten...  Those who continue to abuse her by trying to make money or political capital from her suffering will get no quarter from me... 

17. The Immunity of Idiots.

Unusually I’m posting this entry to both the Hollie Greig and Hampstead blogs that I run. I’m doing so because it contains general observations with respect to how the truth – and the pursuit of the truth – is often damaged by providing succour to blind dogma, and how the unscrupulous are ready willing and able to line their pockets and/or sate their damaged egos and fill their empty lives at the expense of those who have and are suffering.

And no, I haven't written much recently… Both cases are pretty-much a waste of time now; overrun with nutcases whose 'best shot' in life has been overcoming the quaint demon quirks of English grammar to develop a stunning command of stilted prose which illuminates their lack of real intellect in Megalux proportions; more often not even that.

I've been contacted recently by several people, and one gentleman in particular, who has encouraged me to view a discussion currently taking place on the David Icke forum with respect to the Hampstead abuse case.  – I shan't be publishing the link as requested; Mr Icke certainly needs no encouragement or input from me in his side-show endeavours. And I've no intention of trawling much through much of the thread in question either.  The reason being that his forum and indeed his fanbase seems to harbour a significant element that is all of ignorant and deluded and focused on things that are far from the truth. There is little or nothing cogent or of any value to be found there...  

It is unfortunate if reality results in explanations that are "too neat" (to quote one particular idiot) for those with dogma snapping at their heels or who fear their sideshow ending. Real life often is quite prosaic, the truth dull and unentertaining. Events are often consequences of some previous action. And cogent explanations are by their nature very-often rational logical and 'neat'.

Dismissing the truth on the basis that it is too dull to provide adequate entertainment does not in any way challenge it.   

Likewise if they – Icke's Conspiretards - are unsatisfied with the 'content' I provide… 

In this respect some do seem to have confused me with one of their own kind; a 'stairhead fishwife' like Icke or Belinda McKenzie whose stock-in-trade is titbits of juicy gossip; making capital at the expense of others suffering.  For clarity – I am not here to thwart justice or provide dirty laundry for you to sniff. I merely comment on the truth, and stick to what is legally reportable and, in my professional opinion, in the public interest…

In other words I am disinterested in supplying what amounts to a form of pornography – get your cheap titillation elsewhere!

And for clarity I am completely unmoved by the implied 'rejection' by those who seek their vicarious thrills and, in some cases, validate their own twisted perspective through wallowing in conspiritainment.  – I require no validation from the likes of them I can assure you…   And I have no ambitions or need to gain position within their childish 'clique' or make motion in the world of flim flam.  

For my only interest really is in the plain simple truth…  Dull as it is.

Therefore (for instance) the reason why I debunked Robert Green and Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy's blatant pack of lies about Alex Salmond is not political but that it is, quite simply, and provably documented as a complete and utter pack of bloody lies…  Lies with a clearly sectarian-political motive.  

I couldn't care less about Salmond and would just as readily have debunked lies about Margaret Thatcher, David Cameron or Ian Duncan-Smith; all of whom I regard as thoroughly evil people.  For the simple fact is that lies are lies, the truth is the truth – it's that simple, even if the latter is inconvenient…  

'Taking down' an enemy with a lie is not an act of integrity; and risks providing an escape route for the guilty.  For if one aspect of a conviction is proven to be unfounded then the whole of it becomes unsafe. And the fact that Green did indulge in this palpable lie destroys any notion of him being a man of integrity.  – If it's the truth of the Hollie Greig case he sought then he should have stuck to just that, and not indulged in making up stories to sate his own sectarian-politico aims and agenda.

Whilst I am on the subject of lies and liars it is also palpably untrue – as recently inferred by Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy - that I never communicated with Robert Green. For I was at one point in quite regular email contact with him in an effort to encourage him to 'reign back' the embroidered idiocy of the Hollie Greig case and focus on the prosaic truth. For sure, I wouldn't waste the time and petrol going down to see him. But I gave Robert Green sound advice – which would have kept him out of jail and recovered that part of the story that holds water; allowing the real can of worms at the heart of the case to have been opened. 

But Robert Green – as is now clear – only had his own place on the conspiritainment gravy-train in mind, and zero interest in the truth.Robert Green is not and never was interested in getting to the truth of the Hollie Greig case - for it is rather dull.

As a determined martyr, spurred on by McKenzie he continued in his quest for limelight and eschewed the truth. The man is a damned bloody liar! Habitually so it seems!  A liar who has been central to (paraphrasing Mark Daly) ensuring that the one grain of truth in the Hollie Greig case being washed away in a tidal wave of nonsense…  And in that respect he stands today just as suspect as the disgraceful Greg Lance-Watkins. Two sides of a single coin.

- As for Icke himself, and his forum and his fans and their like?

As you might gather I'm really not a 'fan' of 'conspiritainers' generally and especially David Icke.  It's true he does speak the truth much of the time and a lot of it is deeply disturbing and something we ought to know about. But then he goes and spoils it all by saying something stupid, often really very stupid indeed. - Quite deliberately in my view.  By this means Icke - and his kind - cause the baby of truth to be thrown outr with the bathwater of nonsense. - This is how they work to provide a smokescreen for the very system they shill for.

And for me Icke is foremost among those hiding the truth in plain sight – Clown Prince of the British disinformation industry. – And, making as he does a very good living out of it, he is very much part of the problem, not the solution.  

However, some relevant points have been made by those of his readership who wrote to me and it is reasonable to address them…

********

The Hampstead 'Papa Eats Babies' hoax - and it is a cruel and evil hoax - is to the fore just now.  And yes! - I do remain troubled as to why the British authorities have (apparently) not acted – and it seems foreign hosting companies are complicit in this inaction – to 'stamp out' the repeated identification of the children involved in the Hampstead abuse case.  Even if they were to wave a magic wand and elimintate all such material today it would be too little too late. The damage is done.

I am also – for those who aren't in the business of building straw-men – quite vociferous in criticising the authorities in their actions to gag – rather than debunk critics such as (for instance) Robert Green. 

And I do agree; such cases do smack of a culture of institutional cover-up.  There is a problem here. Our overlords are corrupt to the marrow. Something simply has to be very wrong with a system which refuses to use existing laws but instead reaches for a clumsy bludgeon to silence its critics.

I work on the near sure assumption that the authorities are not as stupid as they make themselves seem. They must understand that they generate questions in their wake – questions that could otherwise be easily dispelled.  Therefore there is purpose in such duplicity – and that purpose is not to serve justice or meet society's needs; but to exploit its weaknesses and set smoke-screens…

Cherry-picking elements of such cover-ups and twisting them to fit some 'pet' theory is quite simply dishonest – but for the sake of entertainment (and profit) it's what Conspiretards do, and the authorities and con-artists (like Icke) regularly exploit this.  Therefore my position is that those who admix the truth with outrageous lunacy are working to hide that truth – to ensure that any rational person WILL surely  dismiss it as the ranting of idiots.

For instance when the much-criticised BBC, in a recent radio programme, recounted the Hampstead children's testimony they did so using actors. This wasn't done for any dramatic effect or to draw attention from anything. And I can be fairly-sure that 'dramatically speaking' the producers might well have preferred to use the original recordings. - It's simply what the law demands and, as previously explained elsewhere in my writing, the law makes such demands to protect the victims of sex crimes and give them opportunity to rebuild their lives.

Legally and morally no responsible reporter would risk exposing a sex-abuse victim to pillory by identifying them…

But this was quickly picked-up by the Conspiretards and twisted to try and link the Hampstead Hoax to Savile, and from there promote the notion that the BBC is riddled with institutional paedophilia. 

Meanwhile Conspiretards continued to blatantly exploit footage of the Hampstead children, placing their wellbeing in further danger, something that continues to this very day.  And for clarity, it is not legally sufficient of the various amateur 'Lego journalists' for them to have partially (i.e. inadequately) blurred out the kids' faces in certain posted versions of recordings. And it is particularly unsatisfactory that some have merely 'inverted' (i.e. turned negative) the picture… An easily reversible step…  Which one could argue is deliberately contrived to make the kids' faces available to sexual deviants whilst trying to circumvent various bans on posting the material.

Any genuine seeker of truth would take the time to educate themselves in the laws of the land and understand their purpose.  Any genuine seeker of truth would immediately recognise the need and the value of these laws. Any genuine seeker of truth would understand that victims need to come first; and make no move that might cause further harm. But for conspiretards the BBCs compliance with the law, and their seeking not to further endanger children or expose them to further abuse is a game-spoiler. And how long and how hard they bleat, exposing the kids to yet more abuse as they do so…

Partially of course this is due to stupidity and ignorance – such as that displayed by the parade of clearly mentally-ill people such as the unfortunate Neelu Berry.  But, sickeningly there are the more culpable seeking celebrity, such as the sickeningly ill-educated self-proclaimed 'journalist' Angela Power Disney. - Or self-styled legal advisors such as Robert Green or Sabine McNeill. 

The latter two are particularly pertinent examples – neither was ignorant of the law and I can tell you first-hand that Robert Green was provided with the material to educate himself.  Neither was incapable of assimilating the information or guidance which is readily available…  They simply chose to ignore the law, instead promoting what they knew to be nonsense – in a  quest for potentially lucrative martyrdom…

********

Great harm has been done to various children through the Hampstead Hoax.

Primarily of course I am referring to 'P & Q' as the limit of reporting restrictions allow me to refer to them. Their faces, voices and names are strewn all over the internet and not just in 'historically posted' materials but in current, freshly updated material.

But it must be remembered that these two unfortunate innocents are not alone! For in the course of uttering baseless and defamatory statements about various adults in relation to the Hampstead case, other children fall foul to what journalists and other professionals refer to as 'jigsaw identification'.  And the law is – on several levels – very clear as to the illegality of this.

Without a shred of care for the psychological wellbeing of children who are complete strangers and innocents – abuse and insane allegations have been thrown at parents as they go about their daily business, maniacs – themselves child abusers to the marrow – have show blatant disregard for their victims as they have unloaded the putrid filth from their own imaginations onto innocent families.  – In their attempts to mind-fuck complete strangers the children have been transparent to these lunatics, for all their vulnerability.And therefore it is the children who have been made to suffer most.

As surely as anyone who physically indulges in the sexual abuse of children, those who have promoted and gloated and made-merry around the Hampstead Hoax have damaged the minds and blighted the minds of innocents; and are themselves just nonces of a different shade… 

Primum non nocere, non-malfeasance – the primary guiding principal of anyone working on the side of right. And that which sits at the heart of our laws and conventions on child protection.  - Meaningless to the dishevelled madmen and women who in their efforts to vilify the parents painted vile and twisted pictures on the blank canvas of children's minds.

Hundreds of people have now had their lives damaged by the 'Papa eats babies ' scam.  …And for what really? Not the sake of any truth or reality – but to sate the perverse appetite for conspiritainment, in order to make cold hard cash and promote the interests of certain Grifters and con-merchants. 

The 'puzzle' (as if it really were that) is that both hosting companies and 'law enforcement agencies' – to use a wide-ranging term – are it seems 'tolerating' and tacitly-allowing this… 

********

Before going further with this I am fully aware that certain postings have been taken down either by court order, the intervention of the police, or the simple involvement of lawyers.  But in the great scheme of things is has been – as is so often the case – far too little far too late…  

Google and YouTube – among the main offenders in terms of giving platform to these maniacs - are infamous for their insultingly-inadequate sham 'protection policies' will answer to nothing short of state intervention in the shape of law-enforcement agencies.  In recent weeks it has taken determined lobbying from victims, their solicitors and a diverse range of media professionals to cause law enforcement agencies to become involved and force these hosting companies to act in respect of the Hampstead case.  – And even at that, images and video of the children are still easily found today…

Whilst I would not discourage readers from 'reporting' incidences of these and other victims being identified, to hosting companies directly, you are in my opinion farting against thunder!  - They just don't care!  But then what else might you expect from the savage predators of a new frontier?  Non-malfeasance comes way down the line from profit where these companies are concerned.

Should you ever find yourself the victim of the online defamation game – even where (as is the case with Hampstead) there is a criminal (malicious communication) element to that defamation, you will for instance probably find your local police force  to be 'not fit for purpose' in terms of their interest in action. Modern policing seemingly-has more to do with keeping the crime stats down than actually tackling crime. And if you're persistent in trying to assert your rights or take a stand against crime, there is every chance the Police will turn on you – by some means – to try and shut you up… And stop you from despoiling their nice, neat, tidy, crime figures…

But in itself this is no great global conspiracy per se. The mega-corporations of the internet do not have the slightest interest in your personal safety or the safety of your children.  – Conspiritainment drives traffic, and traffic means profit.  And though they may feign 'responsibility' and concern, the plain truth is that their systems are designed to deflect complaints long before they will deal with them.  – They are quite happy to make money from other people's suffering. 

- As for the Police and their inaction? It's simply that Politicos – the Robber-Barons of Westminster - have over the past quarter-century or so de-resourced and dumbed-down the police service.  Officers are no longer selected or progressed on their integrity and skill but on their compliance in terms of being happy to trot out party-lines and meet vacuous 'targets' without question. 

And this pattern is by no means limited to the Police Force but cuts right across public service…  Your local police simply lack the time, knowledge, resources and have had the will knocked-out of them to deal with what they will view as 'trivial' matters of 'online squabbling'…   

Local police apathy is perhaps explainable – if not justifiable or acceptable. But there are those 'out there' whose actual job it is to act on such things. And the question is why are they not doing it?  Consider for instance those who should be policing the scam artists milking this type of case… It is not news that Belinda McKenzie's latest scam – The Knight Foundation – is now under investigation by The Charity Commission. Calls for it to be investigated have been made by a number of different people almost since its inception.

And it's not as if McKenzie doesn't have 'form'…

Aside of course from the infamous Iran Aid scandal, McKenzie was also linked to a scam 'charity' calling itself "Against Child Abuse" and latterly "Truth and Hope" – The latter was particularly deceptive as there is in existence a genuine, properly registered and fully legitimate Christian charity called "Faith, Truth and Hope"…  

"Against Child Abuse" was most notable for utilising the 'charity number' XT26748. – Charity numbers simply do not take this form.  And let's not forget the 'Starchild' project or the fact that McKenzie was rattling the 'charity' tin supposedly for Hollie Greig.  

In keeping with this pattern… Named with confusing similarity to The (American) "John S. and James L. Knight Foundation" – and the now-defunct English charity the "Thomas Knight Foundation" – Belinda McKenzie's latest scam has, without any form of charity registration, been soliciting donations which it was passing on to Sabine McNeill – a woman who until a few days ago was living as a fugitive from the law due to her criminally-incompetent actions whilst masquerading as a lay-legal advisor in relation to the 'Papa eats babies' Hampstead SRA hoax…

But it has taken a degree of 'heaven and earth' movement from a number of credibly-interested people to get the Charity Commission 'interested' in reviewing the latest shenanigans of this serial-scammer…  

Why is that?  And how the hell was she ever allowed near any kind of charity activity after Iran Aid?  Again; given that the authorities are not stupid it can only have been by tacit consent that McKenzie has for these many years been able to get away with her scamming, grifting ways…

Like Greg-Lance Watkins she is now becoming more 'idiot' than useful.  And it would appear that she has now exhausted the limits of her apparent state-sponsored immunity.  The spectacularly incompetent illegality of what her Association of McKenzie Friends scam was doing has been the unravelling of her – in the eyes of all but the most unhinged and/or dishonest of conspiretards and con-artists at least.

We see the arrest in recent days of Sprechstallmeister McKenzie's most recent 'buffer'  - Sabine MacNeill . And her latest hokkani boro? Very possibly nipped in the bud! We hope!

And many do sincerely hope it is not long before this evil old grifter herself is prosecuted and hopefully jailed…   Whilst there is no mitigation for them – they are after all grown adults who should know better – Belinda McKenzie has – quite clearly – set up both Robert Green and Sabine McNeill to 'take the drop' for her scams.

Time the old witch had a taste of her own porridge?  Possibly not as she quite calmly announces she's quitting the country…  And, it seems the authorities are quite content to allow her to do so. Perhaps she's simply playing the last of her 'get out of jail free' cards?

And what is the net outcome of her and the likes of Icke's actions? 

Lying con-men such as the transparently-dishonest Ben Fellowes/Lee Hazeldean/Jonathan Pitt (three of his aliases) and well-known crooks like Andrea 'Tara' Davidson are closely associated with the conspiritainment circuit.

The latter I know was, thirty-odd or so years ago running various low-level scams in and around the London area.  I know this for at the time I was a local-news cameraman. She had a scam running whereby she would claim (for a not inconsiderable fee) to be able to get her victim a council house. – A fake official, complete with forged credentials and documents completed the illusion… Arrangements made and bribe (circa £1K – quite a bit of cash in 1982) handed over, Davidson and her accomplice would move on to another district and another victim.

By 2012 she had progressed to being convicted by a jury – in her absence of fraud, theft, falsification of census records, operating a fake document factory and operating multiple bank accounts in the UK and various off shore locations under multiple false names. …Some 26 charges in all. She is also linked to the infamous George Abru Gang and, it's thought, various high-level politicos.

Davidson has also tried to cash-in on the Jimmy Savile scandal by claiming to have been at Duncroft Approved School for Girls in Staines… On 'the list' of Savile's alleged haunts. Naturally, she claims to have been abused. In reality it seems she was somewhere very different. 

The conspiritainment industry seems infested by known crooks like this – it is literally the modern day wild-west sideshow…    How DO they get away with it? 

********

It would be inappropriate to close this piece without drawing attention to the fact that Conspiretard Street is not a one-way avenue. The conspiracy circuit thrives on staged-battles. And staged-battles of course require carefully selected warring factions whose job it is to keep the audiences eyes off the scenery-shifter working away at the back.

It was so in the Hollie Grieg case where the polar-opposites of Robert Green were no more interested in the truth of the matter than those making merry over it. Notably, whilst the extended allegations surrounding the Hollie case are palpable nonsense there has actually been no action or hearing which exonerates anyone of involvement in Hollie's abuse…  

Ironic because the inquiry Green called for would have achieved just exactly that!

As Mark Daly noted, the one part of the Hollie Grieg story that does stand up to scrutiny has been washed away in a tide of nonsense; with both sides contributing to that tide…  What was it in that sickeningly-routine grain of truth that caused all hands to go to the pumps in order to try and stop the can of worms from being opened? 

We see something similar in the childishly abusive Scarlet Scoop and 'her' Hoaxtead Research site.  – A site that seems closely-aligned with the 'Holly Hoax' brigade and equally frightened of the truth… It is, quite frankly equally-and-oppositely as unhinged as the mentally ill 'Jacqui Farmer' Hampstead Research site…  With 'Scarlet Scoop' in particular having proven 'herself' every bit as dishonest – and perverted – as her opposite number...

For instance, on the 9^th of June 2015 we passed the following comment, obtained via Google+ and apparently authored by one of the Hoaxtead team, to the Police…

"Who the fuck's XXXX? As for your pathetic death threat, that's even more laughable than your jealousy over a blog that shits all over yours, is better spelt and more professionally written and has a much higher view count. Oh and you loved it until I banned you, haha. Want me to screenshot some of your fawning sycophantic comments and display them to embarrass you? Or maybe I'll just edit them to make it look like you threatened to rape me then pass them on to the Police. Either way..."

"Pathetic death threat"?  - Let me reproduce the tail end of what 'she' was responding to…

"As was - and remains true of the Hollie Greig case, the professionals don't stop investigating nor do they buy into one party line or another. - But fret not XXXX... I won't be exposing any 'innocent' swingers or 'amateur porn stars from the 1980s unless I discover them to be on the 'extreme' edges of the greyscale - and even then my first port of call will be the police... Now - Go away XXXX and wait for the knock…"

"The Knock" of course being common parlance for a visit from the Police… 

And yet here, this clearly twisted and dishonest individual is quite prepared to cry 'death threat' and offers to fabricate a very serious false accusation which 'she' is fully prepared to take to the Police... 

How is this any different in principle to Ella Draper fabricating a wild story in order to damage her ex-husband?  Or Anne Greig's 'imagineering' a wild tale of high-level paedophiles, murder and cover-up at the highest levels?  

 - Whilst such threats are water off the proverbial 'duck's back' they are telling of a mentality  which is warped and a moral compass that is long-since degaussed!

There is no basic difference between 'Scarlet Scoop' publishing (or even just republishing) restricted documents on her website and Sabine McNeill or Belinda McKenzie or Robert Green doing likewise… The hypocrisy is astonishing!

And no; reporting restrictions on the arrest of Sabine McNeill have not been "lifted" to any extent.  The case remains legally 'active' and consequently the professional press have adhered to the restraint put upon them by law.  - On the other hand, "Scarlet Scoop's" claims that there is 'nothing illegal' about what she has done - and that 'she' 'regularly checks this' - are childish, uneducated tripe...

It is true that the Police and other authorities have 'played' Scarlet Scoop and carefully monitored 'her' blog; but as much for information regarding any offences she might be committing as gleaning information as anything else…  The Police, quite clearly do not endorse those who are themselves breaking the law; and I fully expect (it's rather obvious from what they have written actually) that those behind the 'Hoaxtead' blog actually don't understand how 'far out on a limb' they have placed themselves… Morally and legally.

For instance… Despite her obvious culpability, making merry at the plight of the obviously-seriously-mentally-ill Neelu Berry is hardly the action of someone with right in mind or on their side.  Neelu is quite clearly a very sick woman, and who knows what she may be capable of?  "Scarlet Scoop's" pilory of her could very easily be the catalyst that worsens her condition, causes her to become suicidal, self-harming or even to 'go postal'.  - If Neelu 'cracks' and goes on to hurt some innocent person - that will be in part due to the actions of 'Scarlet Scoop' and her band of merry-makers.

The Police - were she really interacting with them - would readily point this out and warn her against behaviour that is likely to precipitate a Breach of The Peace!  

Similarly; publishing (or, I stress, even simply re-publishing) parts of Sabine McNeill's private medical record or for that matter her restricted legal documents, is none of legal or moral. – Sinking to the same depths as those who indulge in witch-hunting is simply in itself witch-hunting. And just because something has been placed (illegally) in the public arena does not place it in the public domain.

'Scarlet Scoop' is clearly cast from the same die as those in her sights...  These are not the actions of a morally sound or justified person. Rather, Scarlet Scoop seeks celebrity and self gratification within a small pond of prize idiots who wallow in the traffic stats from their tawdry activities and imagine their small world is the world...

But such is the nature of the cheap, tawdry conspiritainment industry and those who treat its boards.  – Blowing smoke to keep your attention away from the truth.   MI5 you say? Nothing so glamorous I'm afraid. – More like something from MFI… One leg shorter than the other so as it doesn't stand up and full of carefully drilled holes; all in the wrong places!