26. A question for all readers...

I deliberately held-off this post until after the result of the 'Brexit' referendum... 

A result that, for the record, as a Scottish nationalist (note the small 'n' - it's important!), I personally view as positive.  Contrary to what some may like to imagine I do not favour replacing one parcel of rogues with another!  - I  do not endorse the globalist agenda; I view it as sinister... And largely responsible for parts of my country being  laid a post-industrial wasteland where the victims are those that might once have filled the factories, mines, steelworks and shipyards that our politicians - especially the SNP - sold and continue down the river for a handful of magic beans and a few wampum beads...

I mention this solely because of what the perverts and pervert-apologists would like to pin on me...  No, I'm not an 'SNP shill' or am I pro-EU. Curious politics?  - I despise politics and politicians...

 - Not that it really matters...

In my last post I reflected upon and made mention of Greg Lance Watkins  hailing the murder of Anna Lindh as the act of a "patriot" and how he called upon other anti-euro campaigners to be prepared to take similar action against government figures here...  I could not know at that point what tragic events were about to unfold.

Truly, you would have to have quite a sick mind to align yourself with lowlife  that thinks it a good thing that a middle-aged woman is killed as she goes about her lawful business.  I certainly could not predict that one of his apparent disciples would actually carry out his wishes and repeat this vile act...

And that lead me to think more about what sort of sicko does draw alongside lowlife like Greg Lance-Watkins?  And what of the rest of the raggle-taggle bunch of weirdos who are so bloody desperate to shut me up? 

So, I have a fairly long list of questions I'd like every reader to answer for themselves...

Have you ever …

•  Boasted of the primary school you attended – in a manner designed to mislead the casual reader into thinking you attended Cambridge university?
• Been convicted of drug offences?
• Been convicted of possession of a HIGHLY illegal firearm?
• Been convicted of possessing a type of ammunition for that firearm that is banned under the Geneva Convention?
• Used the terrorist-favoured technique of breaking your illegal weapons down into parts then hiding those parts across several buildings?
• Been convicted of raping a number of young girls, some not even past their first decade of life?
• Run a scam 'employment project' ostensibly intended to relieve poverty in one of the most deprived areas of an inner city – then embezzled the various grants and loans received?
• Been convicted of beating up a disabled man with an mental age of around seven in the street because he mocked the ridiculous 'top hat and cane' outfit you were wearing?
•  Gone bankrupt because you were too stupid to realise your business partner was a con-man who held all the assets while you held all the debts?
• Failed as a husband/wife/father/mother because your former partner felt you simply weren't safe to be around your own kids?
• Subsequently been banned by the authorities from contact with your own child because you were deemed a such a serious danger to them?
•  Coached a very young child into repeating a lurid sexual fantasy of your own creation then recorded that performance on a mobile phone?
• Done time in Jail?
•  Been bankrolled in middle-age, by an elderly parent (after a lifetime of bumming around and non-achievement) in a property and business which you then allowed to dilapidate into a slum and go into financial freefall while you pursued the creation of various childish, self-aggrandising fantasies?
•  Run a business into the ground to the point where it was half-boarded up and not trading…  Then tried bizarrely to project the blame for that failure onto the local council for having upgraded the local high street and promoted the town?
• Expressed delight at the fatal stabbing of an innocent and perfectly respectable  middle-aged woman as she shopped for clothes in a high street store?
• Defamed a perfectly respectable  headmaster and war-hero by falsely claiming he spanked you in a sexualised way?
• Boasted that of effectively walking in the shoes of Dunblane monster Thomas Hamilton by visiting your former school with the intention of murdering your former headmaster?
•  Having indulged in a chilling pre-echo of the Dunblane massacre (according to your own boasts) since then publically obsessed over that tragic event? 
• Trawled enthusiastically in an online blog (or other media) through the deeply-personal and minute detail of the alleged sexual abuse of a disabled child? Or put another way, written up what amounts to textual pornography along those lines…
• Baselessly stalked a Cheshire solicitor and harassed the man at his house?
•  Baselessly accused a judge of being a sexual deviant?
•  Stalked the Lord Advocate at her home?
•  Baselessly accused your child's grandparent of being a paedophile out of spite – because the authorities had barred YOU from seeing your child due to the danger you presented to them?
• Deliberately misrepresented documents and facts – even after you have been publically debunked with written evidence and checkable references – in order to  promote a money-making/politically motivated hoax?
•  Been implicated in a £75M charity scam and subsequent 'torching' of the paperwork to avoid prosecution?
• Subsequently been implicated in dodgy scam after dodgy scam?
• Fed small children on dope?
•  Stalked a teenage university student, causing her to fear for her safety?
• Traded in extreme pornography?
•  Been a drug dealer?
•  Stolen a van or other motor vehicle?
•  Robbed a house?
•  Mugged anyone?
• Run a charity recycling scam?
• Indulged in the 'swinging' scene?
• Been involved in the making of an underground  pornographic film or video?
• Been a Soho stripper?
•  Been convicted of fraud?
•  Hidden textual child-pornography in your office at a children's charity on behalf of your sexually-deviant partner whose predilection for young girls you had known about for decades? 

No? Me neither… We all make mistakes in life of course… Nobody's perfect!  But compare and contrast that list above with the range of things any sane person living a reasonably normal life might get wrong… 

Yet that is a list of the things that can be proved about various individuals on either side of the Hollie Greig hoax and who have involved themselves in various other conspiracy-based scams that I have looked into at various times. These people are strange bedfellows only in the sense that they're all very strange individuals!


Exemplary of this is the grotesque, shambling, urine-stinking figure of Greg Lance-Watkins for instance; an individual who is responsible for several of the items on that list…    He is the very man who welcomed the killing of Anna Lindh. He is the very man who publically declared the hope that a statue would be erected to the Briton who might carry out a similar act at some point in the future…

I say then that the opinion that Greg Lance Watkins incited the Murder of Jo Cox is an entirely reasonable one. - For who but a madman could endorse murder as he so surely did?

Consider the FACT that when Jo Cox was murdered in the street her killing was very much a copy-cat crime. Carried out by exactly the sort of deranged right-wing nutjob Greg Lance-Watkins is a role model for and encourages in his writings and rehtoric.

Now... No doubt the snivelling wimp will try to distance himself from his vile comments; the spineless, lying arsehole has tried to do so before... But that IS what the scumbag said... And it's not the worst of what this corpulent waster has come out with in his attempts at attention-seeking and self-aggrandisement.

I have no hesitation in expressing the opinion that Greg Lance-Watkins has at least a few splashes of Jo Cox's blood on his already filth-stained hands.  

********

Each and every one of those items in the list above is an example of gross criminality and/or perversion and/or failure.  What is more, each of those things can be attributed to one or other or more of the very individuals who have been trying to attack my character over these past few years...

It's almost as if I were of some relevance or threat to their continued liberty. They are very keen to suggest I'm a nobody after all, not that I've ever claimed otherwise… 

I say they protest too much… Exposing their own guilt as they go…

Think about that. …

The plain truth is there is not one of these characters who does not emerge as one or a combination of grifter, criminal, violent thug, sexual deviant, drug-addict, fool or common criminal.  Truly, they are the scum that clings to the edges of humanity's sewers! 

Now… As I've pointed out before - unlike others - this blog does not exist to endlessly regurgitate and obfuscate other people's reports of sex crimes.  Where I do unearth information I go firstly to the proper authorities with it. 

Personally, I'd chose not to publish at all if I thought for one moment that publication would impede justice in any way, shape or form…One reason why I publish so very rarely.

This blog isn't about me serving my own interests, bolstering my own ego or attention seeking. Nor will you find it connected in any way, shape or form to any attempt to seek donations or otherwise gain pecuniary advantage… Again; a contrast to others.

Ask yourself why these people are so desperate to aggrandise themselves?  Ask yourself why they're so keen to try and shut me up? 

 - After all, it's not as if I'm all over social media trying to make a name for myself… It's not as if I'm the one seeking donations or flogging books or DVDs off the back of other people's suffering…  Though they often are!

The threat I present is that of exposure to the proper authorities. And, where I find inaction or corruption, of pursuing these matters at the highest levels.  – Only when all proper channels are exhausted do I go public…    

 And even then, it isn't through the sad, infantile channels of 'Fuckwitbook' or 'Twat-er'… 

They do seem quite frightened of this; being called to account through the proper channels…

Watch them squirm, hear them squeal…  Queen Gertrude walks, deflecting and projecting as she goes; little understanding that all she does is consolidate her own guilt. For clarity that means I couldn't give a damn what lies and sad wee stories these deviants fabricate about me; however far they go in that fabrication. 

– Stones from the glasshouse?   You're a fool if you think they trouble me! Who gives a fuck what a load of dirty benders and worthless druggies think?

25. Another day, another stalker…

When you spend your days dealing with the subject matter I have to (and it's really not a choice I can tell you!), it can take you to some pretty dark places.   It draws the ire of some very disturbed individuals. - Lowlife sub-human garbage like the right-wing nutjob and fantasist Greg Lance-Watkins for instance.  Or scummy filth like Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy. Each as bad as the other... Festering scabs on society's arse; the lowest of the low. 

And when you get close to joining the dots, oh how they panic… How they wriggle! It's amazing the lengths they will go to. Especially when it can be seen that you are actually getting results and people are actually going to jail…  

Clearly they are rattled - for of what interest or relevance am I if I actually present no threat to their bizarre, perverted, hoaxing ways?  If I really am a nobody with nothing to say who know nothing - why are they running so scared?  

It's the amazing the effort that gets put in to discrediting this nobody. - Normally it's childish crap such as cryptic messages from 'Arthur Thompson'- a long dead Glasgow gangster; I guess they must mean something to the deranged infantile mind that sends them. But no one even opens them now...  A collection of silly little Facebook Fannies proving to the world what empty-headed wasters they really are... 

I don't bother with this rubbish personally. – It's part of an office junior's duties here to just delete it and block the senders. Only a very small proportion of these 'abnormal' messages are actually opened let alone forwarded to me. 

One arrived on my desk today though…

" – I could never confirm or deny if these allegations and things written ARE true, but you can bet your arse I’ve made my own mind up."  

And there's the level of logic that's at play...  A mind made-up without even attempting to gather the other side of the story, let alone work out what stands up and what doesn't. That, and a link to a publically attention-seeking diatribe filled with non-truths... Par for the course with these 'types'.

It seems that, as well as my own works email address being abused other members of my household were also targeted by this creepy stalker... Also at their work no less! - Which lends an altogether more 'manic' and disturbing aspect to this undignified and misguded display.

As  a family then we feel fully justified in making this a Police matter. The legislation that covers this is section 39 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 - A prosecution can be obtained on the basis of just two instances of harassment...    Of which we already have evidence.

For clarity, other harassment - originating from within England and Wales - falls under the Malicious Communications Act...   

I shan't publically explore much of the background of the unfortunate and apparently unwell young woman who today made the erroneous and very public claim to be my long-abandoned daughter.  She is no such thing, she's just not!  

She is another man's child. - Which, historically, was rather the problem!  

The fact that (as she admits) her dates don't 'add up' and she doesn't know 'who the hell Rathney is' indicates to me that in truth, she really doesn't really know who the hell I am either...  And that might not be entirely her fault.  But is it in anyone's interests – least of all her REAL father and mother's – that the truth behind this filthy laundry is aired in public?  Dragged through the mud? 

And why didn't she do some basic research? No attempt was made to contact me before she published this vicious tripe!  It would seem that this young lady has part of 'A' story… But of whose authorship exactly? She does seem to labour under various illusions.

I can tell her for instance that a baby born at six months term - that's three months premature - is likely to weigh between 0.4Kg and 1Kg. I can tell her that because of the memories of that horrific week where I sat watching the life slipping from my actual firstborn, who, being at the lower end of that range would literally have fitted in the palm of my hand...

Even today in the 21st century such a child, if it survived at all, would spend MONTHS in hospital before being allowed home...  I'm also reliably informed that such a child is likely to grow up with significant disabilities; not that this makes me mourn the death of my eldest daughter any less. 

The author of that diatribe however will have access to her own medical records, and I strongly suggest she checks them! Giving her the benefit of the doubt, she would seem to be gravely mistaken about the circumstances of her own birth. I strongly suspect that some time educating herself in medical science will confirm that those records of hers are entirely at odds with being a three-month early 'preemie' - as my firstborn was! 

Likewise - I've never given a story to the "Evening Times" or even spoken to them...

The Sunday Times (an altogether different publication) however did once, many years ago, run a 1½-page feature on me...  What the young lady describes as my "rags to riches" story...  It's hardly the latter though! I'm just a working man running the simple family business I and my wife have spent decades building up. 

Why does this attention-seeker want to make such an exhibition of herself?

It would appear that she's lived most of her life with her real Father and Mother, was brought up by them and that the experience was largely positive…  Why then does she want to drag them – especially her mother - through the trash?  And it IS trash! Much of which has already had to be aired in a court of law, which found in my favour. 

But that was a very long time ago... Decades ago...

Although it's very hard for me to garner anything other than contempt for the woman who once mislead me so badly, I do acknowledge that she has the right to move on in peace.  That she had the right to pull herself out the mire she had made for herself - which she seems to have done. And certainly neither she nor the young lady's real father are of any interest to me…   

There have been no 'issues' with them for in excess of 22 years! 

Of course, this tale suits the purposes of twisted excrement such as Greg Lance-Watkins - a dangerous right-wing nutcase. Him, or the drug-addled, too dangerous to be let near his own child,  Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy; both cast from the same die truly.

Both of these men are interested in taking YOUR eye off the ball and ensuring that the Hollie Greig case – and others like it – are parked firmly in 'la la land' along with all the other daft conspiracy stories…  Hidden in plain sight, both of them working hard to ensure the truth of that case is hidden. 

Watkins in particular has been outed irrefutably by me as an out-and-out fantasist… A man who fantasises about being 'spanked' by his old headmaster,  imagines himself in the shoes of Thomas Hamilton, endorses the murder of politicians and even has serious firearms convictions…  

Is it strange that an out-and-proud lesbian (as this young lady is) should align herself with well-known a rabid right-wing crank like Watkins who has been noted for his homophobia?  Or for that matter with the dangerous nutcase Ogilvy?  I do think so...   

What is the purpose of today's episode I wonder? To deflect attention away from what I might-next reveal in connection to the Hollie Greig case or the 'players' who were involved with it?  Or what I might reveal with respect to some other pervert? - It's certainly entirely in keeping with past-attempts with that agenda. And, as I've said, the one thing both sides on the extremes of the Hollie Greig case do seem to fear is the truth…

For her part, I do fear the young lady is exhibiting signs of some form of breakdown or mental instability; and that is very unfortunate. I do urge her to seek medical attention. 

But I am afraid she is labouring under a delusion if she thinks my daughter is any kind of  'little sister' to her. And I can advise her that today she has brought nothing but fear, distress and alarm to the girl!  This stalker's comments and approach today were found threatening and sinister – so much so that we have already alerted the police for her protection... 

The young lady would also do well to consider her own future which is in a forward-facing role at what I'll call a large national 'sales' organisation.  It seems she has built some sort of modest career for herself.  We might I think reasonably wonder what her bosses reaction will be if she is convicted of a offence involving online-harassment, stalking or otherwise breaching public order...   

She would also be well-advised to consider what impact the presence of today's  immature and irrational public ouburst will have on her future career!  For she has aligned herself with some of the most derranged cranks, criminals and fraudsters alive in Britain today... 

A bizarre parcel of rogues whose 'achievements' range from multi-million pound charity fraud through fantasising about being spies, forgery, the sexual abuse of children, drug-dealing and extreme right-wing politics including the endorsement of murder...  

By way of example I'd urge the young lady to research Greg Lance-Watkins' comments on the death of Anna Lindh. - Stabbed to death as she shopped in a high street store, Watkins thought her muder 'the act of a patriot'... The absolute scum of the earth and dregs of humanity! 

And now she's a poster-girl for a man who endorses murder and seems to wish he had walked in Thomas Hamilton's shoes...  Certainly no offspring of mine would align themselves with sewage like that.

I do sincerely hope she gets the medical attention she apparently needs…  But either way I'm sorry miss, but I am really NOT your father! I believe you were actually brought up by him.  And should perhaps have a little more respect for the man in that regard - he really is the 'daddy', not me...

24. Greg Lance Watkins… As big an idiot and liar as ever.

A couple of things have been brought to my attention today which warrant public comment... 

Firstly... IF you have arrived here via comments on the Aangirfan blog please be aware that these have absolutely NOTHING to do with me!   If I post anywhere I shall do so in my own name!  - It was something of a feature of the time when I was commenting on the Hollie Greig case that various 'impersonators' would pop up here and there...  And this crap seems to go on and on and on...  

In case it has escaped your notice I am NOT a fan of the 'conspiracy scene', and have no interest in the smoke these people blow. I do not, in general, concern myself with the blogs these people write or the forums they hang out in! You will not find me using FaceBook - which I regard as dangerously infantile - nor am I in the slightest bit impressed with all the hocus pocus crap about numerology, space aliens, weird illuminati cults or any other such stupidly-childish bollocks! 

Secondly...  Brought to my attention today is this load of old crap from Greg Lance-Watkins.  – Presumably in response to a recent visit paid to him by officers of the law…  

https://holliegreigetc.wordpress.com/tag/quinn-matt-rathney/

This sad, dishonest,blethering fool attempts to attack the business interests that have fed and clothed me and my family for some thirty years on the basis of a couple of dormant 'shell' companies I keep for legal reasons...

It's interesting that the equally-disreputable convicted criminal  Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy should be so very very keen to align himself with Greg Lance-Watkins... Birds of a feather I guess!  

Factually Greg Lance-Watkins is an unhinged attention-seeking ghoul who has variously endorsed the slaughter of an innocent woman in the street, been convicted of SERIOUS firearms offences and once-boasted of a chilling pre-echo of the Dunblane tragedy in which he himself entered his own old primary school with the intent of murdering his former headmaster; a Mr Butters...  To speak of but a few examples of his lunacy! 

Of this pre echo there is, it seems, some indication that it might be true!  

However, lets suppose that like much of the pish spouted by Greg Lance-Watkins it's just a 'STORY' he made up to aggrandise himself...  Imagine what sort of sick, perverted mind might fantasise about being - in effect - Thomas Hamilton!  And elsewhere in the same sordid tale expose their fantasy that they were previously 'spanked by the Headmaster' in a sexualised way! 

- This is the reality of Greg Lance-Watkins' world! The man truly is a joke!

We can understand why the workshy waster Ogilvy knows nothing about business structures. But apparently, wallowing in ignorance as he does, the 'great business mind' Watkins doesn't understand what a shell company is, or why one might use one when handling IP rights.  – Or why (for instance) such a company might be kept dormant or why it might owe the people who actually own it money. 

Yup! I personally am owed three grand by a company that I and my wife wholly own, and I have another (kept dormant) shell company set up to protect the particular Intellectual Property of a trading name that I've had in use for almost 30 years… Which almost got 'nicked' at one time.  

So what?   - As a self-employed  SOLE TRADER my business affairs are entirely private and not published to the public. - The shell companies are separate legal entities the main purpose of which is to act as a 'buffer' in the event we have to sue a third party in respect of our intellectual properties. 

So much for Greggy the great business guru who can, factually, be directly linked to some of the dodgiest con-artists around…    

It's interesting too that Watkins seeks to make further character assassination based on the fact that I was indeed abandoned by my father as a child and didn't track the man down 'till I was in my 30s...  And in reproducing a post from 1997 – almost two decades ago – when I was seeking contact with my own estranged Father;  Watkins' sheer inhumanity, his psychopathy, shines like a beacon! 

What kind of sick and perverted mind would project blame or try to make capital, let alone mock someone who as a child had the misfortune to be raised fatherless? - The same sort of dirty-filthy-racist-cunt-of-hell who previously 'danced on the graves' of both my late fiancé and the three-month-premature child we had that only lived for six days... 

Similarly Watkins drags up a newspaper report from 1999 – very dishonestly misrepresenting it as if it were recent – surrounding what was actually one of the very first independent online exposés made in Britain…  The truth? Well we have to rewind a little for that!

It's been an interesting year in the real world. -The place where real people are really concerned about protecting kids from child abusers. 

2015 was the year that saw another old Nemesis – Hugh Mitchell - finally caught and caged; some seventeen years after I brought him to the attention of Lothian and Borders Police who, it would appear, did exactly nothing with the information I gave them…   

Mitchell - a former army intelligence officer - went on to continue his career as a paedophile; he raped a number of young girls and even authored a book and produced videos on the subject of his sick exploits...

What was his market you might wonder! 

Readers will recall that I have long suggested that there are links between the men most-likely to have abused Hollie Greig and the extreme pornography 'industry'. It's known that one of them (like Mitchell) had a collection of obsolete but still serviceable video equipment - there being no requirement among these perverts to produce their filth to EBU standards!  

The pervert 'community' being small how likely is it that there were direct links between beasts like those who abused Hollie and the likes of Hugh Mitchell?  And through what network did they distribute their vile filth?  What kind of animal woud be in a position to provide a 'front' for some piece of scum to walk in off the street and purchase copies of such sick material?  

Having apparently ignored the concerns I raised about Mitchell the very same force - Lothian and Borders - took a similar tack the following year (1999) when I exposed open crime and disorder – including paedophilic behaviour – taking place on the streets of a West Lothian Village called Addiewell; a place that was later proved to be one of the regular 'haunts' of one Ian Samson. - A beast who, in August 2013 was jailed for 14 years for catalogue of sexual offences against children carried out over three decades.

On that occasion not only did the police AGAIN substantially ignore our concerns; but my family and I were 'thrown to the wolves' by police, politicians and local council alike. 

As an aside here... Readers of the Aangirfan blog may care to note that Angela Constance was one such politician; being as she is actually from that village and represented it on what in my opinion is one of the most corrupt councils in Great Britain...   Personally I have no faith or confidence in the woman (largely because of the way she acted towards us over Addiewell) and think her entirely unsuited to investigating such matters. - And you may take that from a dyed-in-the-wool supporter of Scottish independence  who exposed the "First Minister in missing records" lie...

For the 'sin' of exposing crime, and disorder, and concern over 12-year-old girls being plied with drink and groped in the street by grown men; life was made 'uncomfortable' to the extent I could not leave my wife and young child unprotected; and was effectively put out of work for some eighteen months.  The experience cost us tens-of-thousands of pounds as (among other things) multiple cars were wrecked in the street and we were eventually forced to flee what was supposed to be our home. 

But the odd thing about all that is that we were 'attacked' by the local thugs even before we moved into that place… Before anyone could possibly have had a clue who I am or what I am about… Not by any 'natural' means at least.

On the very first day I took possession of the house, and had gone up to the place to measure up; I returned to my van to find it had two tyres let down and the words "we were ere b4 u" (slightly unusual in pre text-speak days) written in the dust on its bonnet…  'Kids playing gangsters' I thought at the time! – I was wrong! For these criminals were very serious and very vicious. To the extent our lives were put at real risk.  

I have often wondered over the years… Was there a direct connection between Hugh Mitchell and Ian Samson that caused the latter (who really was quite a nasty low-life type thug) to instigate a panicked campaign to get me out of an area where high levels of organised paedophilia and criminality were the norm?  - The common thread of course being that they were both members of the 'Paedophile scene'. And there can be little serious doubt that as a producer of paedophile pornography, Mitchell and him moved in the very same circles... 

A simple question therefore arises when we consider the unity between vermin like Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy and Greg Lance-Watkins...  Their joint 'Queen Gertrude Act'... Birds of a Feather...  

What is their joint agenda?  Who or what exactly is it they are trying to draw attention away from? 

As I've had to point out many times, this blog does not exist to merely regurgitate existing reports and weave them into fanciful sectarian/politico/right-wing fantasises...    Nor am I in the 'conspiritainment' industry...  Rattling the tins for donations from the ignorant and the rudderless...

If and when I do uncover information that might lead to the arrest and conviction of a pervert I take that information to the proper authorities. I have no concern for 'the scoop' or making money out of these things...  And I'm more than happy to maintain absolute silence while the police get on with their job...

You see, it's not actually my place to go kicking doors down... Figuratively or otherwise. Vigilantism serves no legitimate purpose, and is more likely to grant an escape-route to an offender than serve the ends of justice...

And I suspect that's what dysfunctional, criminal perverts fear...     

Information going through the proper channels and reaching a genuine court of law in the appropriate way is likely to result in actual convictions.  Whereas the pervert's preference is to parade key information through online kangaroo courts - which ultimately leads to the argument that a fair trial cannot be lawfully obtained.  - Thus defeating the ends of justice.

It's amusing to note how keen they are to discredit me, and how vacuous their attempts to do so actually are. - After all, if I really am a nobody who knows nothing, what possible threat can I be?  

Queen Gertrude walks again!  

********