29. Explain a fraud?

Such are the laughable demands of the inhabitants of Electric Looneyland... As if I am in some way accountable to scum like them!

There is absolutely no reason why I should and - as it's not of my creation and I am simply not privy to the detail of how it was put together, there is actually no possibility of my being able to explain it.  Nor, in fact, is it my responsibility to explain anything at all... Especially not to the hypocritical dregs of sub-humanity. - Low-life parasitic drug-addicted scum that have never achieved anything in life, don't pay their way and that those of us who do actually have to work for a living shell out in our taxes to support.

Before 'taking out the trash' however, I will first of all and yet again address the rantings of that prize idiot Greg Lance Watkins...  A man who is, as the kids put it, "just butt hurt" that his decades of wallowing in fantastical stories on the internet are finished - with him thoroughly exposed as a dangerously-unhinged lunatic with an unnatural interest in "STORIES" about little girls being sexually abused...

Please, do your own research on the character of Greg Lance-Watkins. - What I have to tell you here is just the tip of a grubby and easily researched iceberg; a starting point. In terms of establishing 'character' I need only reach to the archives and cite facts which indicate what an attention-seeking freak of nature Greg Lance-Watkins actually is...

Contrast, compare and consider the realities dear reader...  

Watkins would like you to believe that I am the 'lowest of the low', citing as 'evidence' of this allegations of my being a divorcee with an estranged child. Quite an interesting view for a man in his own position to espouse! And one that is easily debunked.  - But then, I'm not prepared to manipulate the credulous or vulnerable in order to make what is a vacuous point.

Even if what Watkins claim against me were true (it's not); how does relatively normal domestic strife and disharmony 'measure up' in comparison to what can be proved to be true about his antics?

I'm quite prepared to go into a court of law and assert the well-evidenced view that Greg Lance-Watkins is an attention-seeking fantasist, habitual liar, and a serious danger to innocent people. - i.e. He himself is not just a divorcee with a daughter estranged to him as a child!  Pot...Kettle anyone?

For a start, I cite here (as exemplar) the way he enthusiastically 'examined at length' and with no justification or necessity, the very intimate minutia of Hollie Greig's alleged abuse, even pondering at great length upon the contents of her dirty laundry basket, speculating enthusiastically about the domestic post-rape scene in the Mackie (as it was then) household; something people who followed the case with genuine concern at the time noted as utterly revolting.

Was he enjoying it? One might, in my view, reasonably conclude that yes he was!

A former Officer in the British Army, trained at Sandhurst, he claims... No credible eviedence can be found to support this.  And in this respect I do find it very 'odd' how the only person ever to try and convince me Watkins' tales of Sandhurst and 'working with the intelligence services' might be true is a now-convicted child rapist...

Not only that, but the particular pervert was found to have authored fictionalised accounts of the  abuse they had inflicted upon their own victims.

For the record; this took place back in around 2012 when things were 'hotting up' around both the Ian Samson and Hollie Greig cases...and took the form of me being accosted in the street by the now-convicted pervert Hugh Mitchell and implored to "leave Greg alone"!

I have since learned that, given the illegality of sharing images of child abuse, certain deviants 'satisfy themselves' with purely textual "STORIES" or accounts of child abuse; those being somewhat less-risky for them to be caught with. Indeed you will find this sort of thing reflected in the judgement surrounding the Hampstead Hoax wherein Mrs Justice Pauffley noted that video footage of two children recounting salaciously detailed (and false) tales of 'how they were abused' was likely to exist for the purposed of titillating sexual deviants with a predilection for young children - in other words those YouTube videos were a form of child-abuse 'pornography'. 

I do often wonder how Hugh Mitchell was 'marketing' the filth he created. It's most interesting too that the convicted pervert who spontaneously and desperately rose to Watkins' defence really is ex-army and a former "int cell" operative - an intelligence officer if you like.

The question that must arise here is of course, why was this proven child abuser so keen to defend Greg Lance-Watkins all those years ago?  - What is the link?

No 'fantasy' is involved in pointing out the plain and simple truth of the matter that Watkins is the man who was mainly responsible for promoting the Hollie Greig hoax in the first place.  - He wasn't by any measure "duped", he wasn't mislead; he simply promoted a lie for his own attention-seeking  ends - which, as all evidence reflects, are always disreputable and dubious.

It's indisputable fact that he was not just 'fooled' at the early stages' (as he later claimed) but in fact led the charge right up to and including the very point where the BBC's Mark Daly blew the extended allegations live 'on air' during a radio programme...And Watkins, cover blown, turned turtle.

Watkins has no integrity, and it is easily proved dishonesty runs to his very core.  

Where exactly do you start with a man who claims he was "educated at Kings Cambridge"  (i.e. dishonestly implies that he has an education gained at a top university) when in fact he has nothing beyond an elementary education and this boast in question actually relates to a primary school he may once have attended...  KCS. 

Then there were his idiotic claims to be running "the welsh assembly" from his semi-derelict old junk shop in Chepstow... A business which failed, he claimed, in part because the local town council  invested in and regenerated the area. - One can only assume making his eyesore even more obvious than it had been previously.  

Then of course there is also the three hours of video of this flatulence-filled balloon claiming (among other perverted lunatic fantasies) that Sarah Brown - the Ex-PM's wife - is effectively a live-in prostitute hired to mask Gordon's homosexuality and predilection for under-age rent-boys! 

And let's not forget his tales of daring-do 'secret missions' to fly blood samples out from American airbases during the foot-and-mouth epidemic and what "Her Majesty" taught him at Sandhurst...

The tales related by Watkins in this video are all complete and utter bollocks, a pack of silly lies from beginning to end. 

'Fantasy' he claims? - The videos are still online and easily found as proof of his bare-faced dishonesty, and we have them archived

Indeed, of his "STORIES" generally it is most obvious that his claims and fantasies are utterly infantile; that which you might expect from an ill-bred child.

If only they had remained at the level of a small boy who had overdosed on 'Commando' comics!  But Greg Lance-Watkins has a deeply sinister side to his character, and an unwarranted and therefore unhealthy interest in the gory details of child abuse...

But Greg Lance-Watkins is a man who has blood on his hands...   

This twisted grotesque who was once quite boastful of his terrorist-style firearms convictions is, irrefutably, the piece of sub-human vermin that, on learning of the murder of Swedish pro-EU politician Anna Lind, urged 'other patriots' to carry out a copy-cat killing.

To be clear here, what the deranged idiot Watkins applauded was the cold-blooded slaughter of an innocent middle-aged professional woman as she enjoyed the simple pleasure of shopping for clothes in a high street store. What manner of madman supports such a thing under any circumstances? 

I quote Greg Lance Watkins directly and accurately here;

"I suggest the first patriot to take direct action is remembered by putting his or her statue on the remaining plinth in Trafalgar Square."

Perhaps not-quite believing anyone could utter such insanity he was challenged on these comments by a journalist;

"Yes, I do support the execution of elected politicians when they seek to betray the electorate and their country," he said in interview...

Execution?  - Cold blooded murder in the street an execution?

Is this not the same rhetoric we now hear from Islamic State and was previously spewed out by the IRA.  Terrorism is the word! Greg Lance-Watkins actually encourages and incites terrorism here.

Please do bear in mind that Watkins used those words when speaking to an experienced  journalist who had entered into a conversation with him in order to ensure there was not any mistake or misunderstanding. 

To encourage others to commit a copycat crime, to speak of 'execution' when the reality was cold-blooded murder - the words of a psychopathic madman and a coward of the first order. There is no shadow of a doubt as to their authenticity and I do invite readers to cross-check and confirm what I have written here.

This madness of his is proven... The link to the original newspaper piece is contained herein and you should note its date... 2003. Proving beyond any doubt that this lunatic has been spewing forth his nonsense for many years! 

Those sickening words of his lead directly to further tragedy as  one of his apparent 'fans' carried out his wishes; and it cost a young mother - Jo Cox - her life.

I make no apology for levelling the charge directly at Greg Lance-Watkins that he has Jo Cox's blood on his already filth-stained hands. He is - palpably and irrefutably proven to be a dirty-filthy-minded failure of a man who is just as responsible for leaving that woman's children motherless as the lunatic who is now behind bars for doing what he encouraged... 

Then there is the way he deliberately lead the Hollie Greig case into absurdity. For it was him - and not actually the bungling Robert Green - who released the names of Hollie's alleged co-abused to the world. And it was he who first libelled all those named in the 'smoke screen' fairy story which buried the credible facts surrounding Hollie's probable abuse and helped make her probable abuser 'flameproof'.

All the back-pedalling in the world doesn't change that one iota...  And, as I have suggested many times before, there is nothing in the background of any normal person which remotely compares with the bizarre and gross transgressions of Watkins and his ilk. For truly, this is a coin with two sides...

No, Little Greggy'  - I offer no "fantasies" about you.  I'm afraid all the fantastical tales I accredit to you are - provably - drawn with your own brush... 

********

Conspiracy hoaxing is big business...  It's something which has served the likes of Alex Jones and David Icke well for decades - to name just two of the more obvious leading lights in this industry...  

Then you have the 'bottom feeders' like Watkins who has spent a lifetime tilting at various fringe-politico 'windmills' grubbing a quid here and a quid there as he went.  For all his 'cut glass' accent and pretentious bullshitting the man is essentially a drifter and a bit of a self-created sideshow freak.


But this sort of 'grifting' also attracts the lowest and scummiest of the criminal classes... Real garbage such as drug addicts from the schemes, dealers, pimps and porn dealers - and of course those who have just 'failed at life' generally.  - What's most notable about these characters is that they assume the rest of society views the world through the same dark glass they do...

So, to be clear here, I'm not the one seeking 'fame and fortune' on the politico or conspiritainment circuits off the back of the Hollie Greig case nor any other similar tragedy... I'm not now and never have been.  -Contrary to the desperate lies and faked-up bullshit I'm not out there attention-seeking on social media.  

I'm not the one with the 'Jeremy Kyle' mentality either...  

Oh! I'm well-aware that I have a namesake who even hails originally from the same part of Glasgow (one of several actually) who did disgrace themself on Mr Kyle's tawdry freak show...  But for the sake of the terminally-stupid I'll clarify he's not me, nor is he - as one moron claimed - my son! 

And for the avoidance of doubt, factually, no, I'm not on Twitter - never have been as it seems a completely vapid concept to me. I've never had the 'Twitter-handle' @tfgtv - when it eventually occurred to me to 'claim' it and keep it dormant to protect my brand I found it already gone!  - And of course like all foreign-based (anti)social media sites, Twitter really couldn't give a flying-fuck about cybersquatting!

Oh, I do know a great deal of (really rather desperate) effort was once put into running a fake/troll account in my name...  Some legal shots across the bows eventually had Twitter take that down, although I'm very disappointed to note they issued the @tfgtv name to some kid in London back in July 2015...  

But It still has precisely fuck-all to do with me.

And nope, I don't use Facebook either... They won't act against trademark-infringement unless your company name is registered in some way - for instance as a Limited Company and unfortunately TFGtv never was.  YouTube are similarly disregarding of other people's legal rights... And it's expensive to enforce them! 

As for stats dating back to 2010 relating to a server I haven't used since 2012, and a domain name I've been rebranding away from since 2014... Really?  Are the people who lap this clown-nonsense up really that thick?

Again for the benefit of the terminally-stupid, they mean precisely fuck-all too. 

This is also true of the dormant 'accounts' of various companies I keep which exist only to 'register' and protect a trading name with Companies house...   As a self-employed sole trader my accounts and tax returns are entirely private; and this is a pretty normal, legitimate way of doing business - as any fule knowe! 

But what is the point of any of this? Whether I'm rich or poor is of no relevance...

After all, their great hero Robert Green is a former bankrupt and, according to the e-begging appeals floated on his behalf, destitute! Whilst others of their number are known to have flipped burgers and driven taxis to meet ends meet; not that I offer any criticism of those things. But they are modest, low paying occupations.

As I've pointed out before and will repeat often... I'm not the one with a criminal past or a history of drug-addiction let alone a history of abusing children. And it's pretty transparent that those who do are the people spouting this irrelevant rubbish; clearly they just want to get the heat off themselves.

The plain fact is, I don't require your money... There are no PayPal or Patreon 'begging bowls' set out by me in relation to the Hollie Greig case nor any similar matter. 

I don't expect you to buy books or DVDs or anything else based on conspiracy theories... I don't require a byline, there have been and will be will be no money-spinners of any kind from me based on the Hollie Grieg case. 

I don't need or seek your attention or approval.  - I'm just not a part of the world of the conspiretard...  

In fact, I'm something of a threat to those that do want to exploit these things for their own purposes... Be they trying to cover their own tracks as child abusers, or screwing money out of the credulous running their scams and hoaxes.  

And yes, I will return to the matter of their silly little 'Kyle-Style' fraud a little later on in this piece... 

********

With respect to finding the truth in relation to the Hollie Greig case I'm not here to try and convince you that Hollie Greig was "NEVER abused" - because I do believe the CICA report - which says otherwise - is entirely credible.  

I accept the conclusion of that professional analysis which was based on sound investigation of the case...  But neither do I seek to conflate those conclusions as providing evidence of some other thing.

I highlight that the conclusions reached by the CICA are only that Hollie was - on the balance of probabilities - abused as a child by certain individuals with regular close access to her.  

The CICA report implicates no-one else and illuminates a 'tiny grain of truth' at the centre of the case; nothing else. A grain of truth that has been utterly obscured by all the complete and utter nonsense and pack of lies that was later woven around the matter of Hollie Greig's alleged abuse. 

Yes, I do believe Hollie was abused, and I do draw down the light of suspicion upon those who are so desperate to convince the world there is "NO EVIDENCE" she was - because, as the CICA reflects, there is!  They doth protest too much methinks!

Equally well, I'm not trying to blow a smokescreen around the prosaic but disturbing grain of truth at the centre of this case...

No, there is no 'high level' Paedophile ring...  No grand cover-up. The Sheriff has no sister and if the unfortunate Roy Greig was murdered, it was because he was deep in debt to some very very nasty individuals. Suicide really is the kindest and most-probable conclusion here, and nobody with any sense is likely to look much further...  

The cold hard truth is that all this bullshit - as promoted  by Robert Green and his band of merry mercenaries - can and does achieve, is to hide the truth about the Hollie Greig case amidst (as Mark Daly put it) a "tide of nonsense". 

And whose ends does that serve? - Quite clearly, only those who committed the atrocities that were inflicted upon that poor child (as she was at the time of the attacks). - And their associates. 

It's very interesting that all the nonsense with which Hollie's case has been embroidered - the 'extended allegations' as I call them, serve to draw attention away from the spider at the centre of this web. They drive the notion of a paedophile 'ring' into the realms of sick, delusional, drug-fuelled paranoia.  

Quite deliberately so in my view - indeed my position is that this was Greg Lance-Watkins purpose in promoting the hoax - as he did - at  its early stages...  Mark Daly's  intervention, blowing the extended allegations out the water with one simple fact, scuppered Watkins' plans, and so like the rat he is he 'jumped ship' and started paddling the other way.

I do believe that Hollie Greig was sexually abused, but that abuse was of a sickeningly-common nature and that the case is cold and unprosecutable - this is entirely in accord with the investigation which (contrary to the lies of the conspiretard set) was made, was thorough, and was pursued as far as the law allows in the circumstances. 

And yes, based on the CICA report and other information, I do hold the opinion that the perpetrators of the crimes that were committed against Hollie were - and possibly still are -  involved in other matters pertaining to child abuse and that they have a wide range of 'contacts' and 'associates' also involved in that 'business'. 

It is my evidence-led opinion and contention that at the heart of the Hollie Grieg case there is a link to the trade in extreme pornography - and that many of those who have worked on ensuring the force of that 'tide of nonsense' in obfuscating matters  are also directly involved in that trade...   Equally well I make the firm connection between the 'Hollie Hoax', other similar hoaxes and the drugs trade. - Which in turn is well understood to be connected to human trafficking and child abuse...   

In other words, if there is a "ring" at all, it's a ring primarily of traders and producers in child abuse images, those who 'consume' such material, drug dealers, pimps, prostitutes and other scum of the earth...  

But mixed in with this garbage are other low-level crooks. What some call "grifters". I believe these characters mainly to be motivated by money. 

As much as I'm not promoting the hoax elements of the Hollie Greig case - which I now firmly believe to be in part an attempt to cash in on the same market that Alex Jones and David Icke milk, I am not among those  desperately trying to distract attention away from the fact that something terrible did happen to this poor girl. 

For my own part I also see the case as very-much connected to  the activities of Hugh 'Mitch' Mitchell - a now convicted Paedophile who I had the misfortune to work with back in the mid-90s. 

Having discovered the bastard in flagrante, viewing what I regard as child pornography - footage he had shot whilst working as a technician at a West Lothian secondary school - I reported my suspicions to the police; who seem to have done exactly nothing abut him. He then went on to commit the crimes (child rape) for which he was later convicted...  

The hoaxers silence on the matter of proven child rapist, self-professed well-connected mason and (provably) ex-army intelligence officer Hugh 'Mitch' Mitchell is deafening.

Mitchell was - I am convinced - an associate of one Ian Samson, another now-convicted paedophile who really did run a child abuse 'ring' in the Edinburgh area.  Samson and Mitchell were, in my view, directly responsible for attacks made on my own family just at the turn of the millennium - those attacks being made to try and ensure that I could draw no further attention to their disgusting activities. 

Their business, as well as being filthy, was also lucrative. 

Mitchell is known to have been a producer of obscene videos, photographs and textual 'pornography' featuring child abuse. - Clearly he had a market for this material 'somewhere'...  And that market is, in my view, entirely relevant to the Hollie Greig case. 

My reason for believing this is simple...  Back in the late 90s I encountered one of the individuals credibly named by the CICA as involved in Hollie's abuse, as one of Mitchell's associates and I am convinced they were involved in the same trade...    

You see, this particular fellow - whose name sticks in my head because whilst being common-enough, he insisted on using the French spelling of it - was trying to buy some obsolete broadcast editing equipment from me...  I didn't sell it to him because he couldn't convince me he knew what he was doing with it; and I didn't much fancy the prospect of providing endless 'technical support' over the phone to someone who didn't know the basics.  

Equally well though I was a bit 'put off' by his explanation of what exactly he wanted to produce with it... "Railway videos" says he. Really says I?  - As a railwayman's grandson who literally grew up on the site of the old Balornock yards, old steam strains are a minor interest of mine. And this guy knew hee-haw about trains!

Knowing what I knew - and had reported of - Mitchell and his pal Samson, imagine my disquiet when the very same name popped up all those years later associated with claims of child sex abuse. And credibly cited by the CICA as being under strong suspicion!

********

'Explain this', craws a voice from the depths of the sewer...

It's almost amusing that those who seek to vilify me do so leveraging some Kyle-style nutjob crap that (as well as being untrue) is completely irrelevant and mundane when what I have called them out on are serious matters reflecting real dysfunction; such as their having criminal records, some for serious firearms offences, others for drugs, others still as forgers and fraudsters and even having been deemed such a danger to children that they were barred from contact with their own...

Whatever - and whoever I am is however of no consequence... And yes I am repeating myself, but it does seem necessary given just how thick some people seem to be.

After all it's not me who, as a former bankrupt and business failure is trying to separate the gullible from their cash via sham 'child protection conferences' and other 'charity' scams; it's not me who was (quote) "ON THE BREADLINE" and begging for 'help'!  

You won't find me on crowdfunding sites asking for 'money for nothing'...

It isn't me who wants to flog you conspiracy theories and snake oil...

I'm not the one who is 'attention seeking' or requires your approval...

Nor indeed am I a benefits-dependent waster with no trade or profession.

Factually, I'm not the one who (apparently/allegedly) applied for various 'business grants' in someone else's name. Although that's perfectly in character for the individual concerned and their associates...

That's called "identity theft" and fraud...

"Worthless"?  It's really of no relevance if I am or not; once again - I'm not the one seeking to profit from the Hollie Greig or any similar case in any way shape or form whatsoever.

Yes, I'm quite well aware that Both Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy and Greg Lance-Watkins have indicated that the reason they don't sue me is that I'm 'worthless'; and this is the reason behind their rather childish attempts to kid the world on I am 'somehow' living on fresh air.

Well - I call bullshit on that!  The reason neither of these two sub-human scumbags haven't sued is that they know they haven't a fucking leg to stand on! One word you pair of interlocked pricks - VERITAS!

Greg Lance Watkins liar and fantasist?  Look no further than his deceptive claims to have been educated at "Kings Cambridge". What about him running 'the welsh assembly' from his old junk shop in Chepstow?  Or perhaps we'll reference the video footage of him claiming that an ex-Prime Minister's wife is effectively a live-in prostitute or that another Ex-PM has a criminal record for 'cottaging'! Oh! and then there are his 'secret missions'...

What a sad strange little man! Additionally, the reputation of Greg Lance -Watkins is so palpably low that he is beneath defamation...

Something similar applies to Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy. - Drug Abuser? Happy to prove that using the evidence he himself posted online as well as all the pro-drugs bullshit he posts regularly. Danger to children? - That would be a case of 'call DC King'. And again, this disgusting parasite's reputation is so low he cannot be defamed.

But whatever way you turn this, I remain of no consequence to the facts surrounding the Hollie Grieg case - or the hoax that has been, and continues to be, built up around it; apparently with entirely mercenary motivations...

In other words, follow the money... Follow the begging bowls - figurative and literal! 

And of the fraud it's been demanded I 'explain'?

If fakery is what you want to know about ask Andrea, or is it Tara or Dawn these days? She is something of an expert after all – I hear her Degree Certificates were so good they would fool almost anyone, as were her Driving Licences and Credit Cards; they even worked it's said! As for her fake share certificates and negotiable instruments... Well, they were good enough to cash-in at the bank! 

Though perhaps she was not as not-quite a slick as we might otherwise believe. 

Fact is, Andrea is yet another criminal nutjob (as most on the hoaxing scene are) who has spent the past five years on the run claiming to be a 'spy'. I'm told her new 'documents factory' is up and running in South America, the mail-order service is quick and the standards are high - good enough to get you through customs or a credit check.  Not-quite good enough though...

Then again,  perhaps it's not even as complex as all that...  It's only in relatively recent times that documents used for identifying oneself (such as driving licences) began to carry photographs. Any anyone who could obtain clandestine possession of such things could walk into a bank, a shop or a government off ice and sign-up for anything under the name of another...

But, as I've said, it's not my job to explain a fraud, and as it's not of my making, impossible for me to do so.  Here's one clue though...  

The devil, in this case is in the Deed Poll. Or rather, the lack of it in Scotland. And a statutory declaration made on July the 24^th 1978 which 'somebody' seems to have missed. My name hasn't been 'Matthew' since then... And I do not have a middle name. Not on a Passport nor Driving licence not anywhere; at least not on anything I am a party to...  

There are a couple of other clangers too… 

Having researched the matter it seems that the job of "Careers Officer" is a protected term which has the equivalent status of a teacher. As such it requires not only an honours degree but a post-graduate diploma (the DipCG) and two years further training and experience as a 'probationer'. 

For the hard-of-counting that's seven years all up. 

As the school-leaving age in Scotland is 16, and the 'Highers' necessary to get into university are taken when one is roughly SEVENTEEN, it's extremely doubtful if any twenty-two year old ever met that criteria. 

However, having come through an apprenticeship (entered a month before my seventeenth birthday) and gained my professional qualifications through additional study (day/block release and additional courses), 

...I didn't reach graduate level for another eight years. 

And even then, I have never studied for nor do I hold the DipCG... No, I've never been a "Careers Officer". Nor is my father "deceased" - not even now. 

Oh yes, it's true enough that I was trained (and arguably I suppose 'educated') at the University of Strathclyde - at least for the first year of my apprenticeship - but I am not a graduate of that university! 

I'm not and never have been an "Electronics Engineer" either - although I do hold qualifications in an area that might be considered a branch of electronic engineering, they are quite specific to broadcasting...  

However,  I am aware of certain individuals - known to have stolen my identity on other occasions - who were/are (I've no idea or care whether they are alive or dead now) frankly too thick to assimilate the detail of my educational/professional status, and might well have made these blunders.

And, if the attention-seeker in question had been a little brighter and better educated they might have realised that had my real daughter been estranged (and she's not!) then I would have moved to protect her from the collection of right wing nutters and homophobes (Did I mention that Ogilvy once 'accused' his daughter's mother of being a lesbian - as if that were some pejorative thing?) and violent stalkers - such as the lowlife scum who did terrorise my real daughter and tried to disrupt her education this past year. 

In fact, this particular fish pie features a load of old herrings…  Red ones...  Designed as always to draw the heat off the indisputable facts I have highlighted surrounding both Greg Lance-Watkins and his cohorts who continue to promote the hoax elements of the Hollie Greig case... 

But, as I say, it's not my job to explain them! 

********   

And it's at this point I pause to reflect on the holes the Hollie-hoaxers have shot in their own feet...


For example... who (under any circumstances) but a fellow - and similarly exposed - deviant, would take the perverted rantings of Greg Lance Watkins seriously let alone align themselves with him or present his ranting as 'proof' of anything? - What sort of low-life trash gets into bed with Little Greggy?

Only those with a similar agenda - obviously!

Even after the fact, as he tried to abdicate responsibility when his clumsy duplicity was exposed; it was he who obsessed - some opine 'drooled' - over the very intimate details of Hollie's abuse, clearly drawing some perverse 'gratification' from it; and he also canvassed desperately for others to bring him salacious material in the form of other stories of child abuse. - No doubt so he and his 'many friends' could draw similar enjoyment from it on the 'pervertfest' that was his 'Stolen Kids' blog...

Now - clearly - this man was never in a position to "help" anyone  with their concerns as an allegedly abused person. Quite apart from being an absolute fraud, he has a long track record of abusing those who confide in him for his own sad, sick entertainment and self-aggrandisement... Hollie is a prime example. Had he even a basic concern for the law he (as any credible anti-abuse campaigner does) would never have released Hollie's name let alone those of her alleged co-abused. But the cold hard fact is that he did just that.

Cold hard fact also evidences that the net effect of what he did was to unleash the 'tide of nonsense' that washed away the tiny grain of truth at the heart of the Hollie Greig case; rendering a probable child abuser completely beyond any hope of prosecution.

Really, if anyone should have been 'hunted down by the authorities it was Greg Lance-Watkins and not the unfortunate Robert Green; a serial 'fall guy' if ever there was one...  His exploits after he actually did fail in business (deflection and projection are such common themes here) are well documented. And the man was a bloody fool to talk himself into jail - as he did.

But then, after rat Watkins had jumped off the ship he scuppered, Green was egged-on by another rogue, for whom I hear the clock also ticks...

As I say, the sort of sewage that has spent a lifetime grubbing a 'living' off the back of images of child sexual abuse, is due no quarter or answer from me. The same is true for the vermin that gets (figuratively) 'into bed' with such an animal.  – Especially when they themselves are - variously - convicted criminals, proven child abusers or from long established criminal broods and clearly taking their place in the old family business...

It's not me nor any of mine who – for instance – once had to flee to Éire under a false name with papers stolen from a hapless in-law, in fear from the local 'worthies'... 

If I were Giacomo Girolamo Casanova himself it would alter not one iota of the facts surrounding the Walter-Mitty life and times of Greg Lance-Watkins. Nor would it change the fact that Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy is a convicted drug-offender (by his own admission) who has been deemed by the court to be such a danger to his own child that he was barred from seeing her. 

Factually, Ogilvy rails against the police, social services court and the very same Sheriff who was falsely accused of being a child molester in the Hollie Greig case for a very simple reason; these are the very people who exposed him for what he is, and acted to protect an innocent young girl from him...   

Ogilvy is no 'innocent' caught up in a messy divorce or separation... No anxious parent wrested from a beloved child... This man filled an innocent child's head with perverse sexual fantasies that he himself created; he then attempted to frame an innocent man - the child's grandfather - for these crimes that never happened. This psychopath was quite prepared to put his own offspring through the horrific trauma of a baseless sexual abuse trial, just to wreak revenge on a man who seen straight through him from the first day he met him!  - It's the same when he calls DC King a 'demon' or 'accuses' his ex of being a lesbian. Simply read this moron's own illiterate ramblings in account of what he expect intelligent people to 'swallow', for proof of how completely unhinged he is...  

He actually believes a majority of people are as stupid and uneducated as he is... That  they will be taken in by the monkey-like gibberings of an weed-addled idiot who can't even spell the word "I"!  

It really is just that simple.  - Frankly, they should have jailed the dirty filthy bastard at the time - I am critical of DC King in this respect; it was the biggest mistake of your career letting this maniac walk free - but I do acknowledge that they held back on that so as not to put the kid through the further trauma of a trial.  Clearly a serious error of judgement!

So, returning to the crux of the matter... Nothing about me alters the law of the land that makes it impossible for any minister - not even the First Minister of Scotland - to intervene in any criminal investigation or case.  I do strongly encourage you to read my dissection of Robert Green and his cohorts' lies about there being "missing records" being hidden by the Scottish Government in relation to the Hollie Grieg case - there just aren't! It's complete and utter bullshit!  And I also strongly encourage you to cross-check the facts for yourself, please do read up on what the law of Scotland says about the role of the Lord Advocate.  And while you're about it, read a little of the background to Eilish Angiolini's appointment in that role - and Salmond rather stupidly keeping her in post . 

Then once you've read those two pieces, write to the ICO yourself, go to the library, read the lawbooks, and cross-check the accuracy of everything I've said here. In particular, note that I dissect the full timeline of events... Not just the twisted highlights that Robert Green and his minions try to spin...

Nowhere do I suggest that you just take my word for anything...  

I do note that it must be quite stressful living with a terror of Battenberg and an aversion to blue lights. In a world where the next police van that pulls into the street might have a special place just for you... Especially when your old associates are banged up doing time for rape and every day might bring news of another arrest. 

But that's not something normal people leading decent, productive, law-abiding lives have to contend with… Their desperation is palpable...

Crank phone calls, and the hypocrisy of an 'appeal' not to have a go at my family; when all the time they're busy posting pictures of long-estranged members of it, stalking my daughter, publishing stolen pictures of her and trying (and failing) to undermine the very business that - factually - has put food on the table for over 30 years.

Of course, actually working for a living - rather than scrounging off the state or dealing in drugs or porn - that's anathema to shit like this.  

Theirs is the weird and dysfunctional world, not mine! Isn't it funny how they all resort to the same 'Queen Gertrude' act though?

So I'm a nobody, with nothing to say. Fine, let's run with that... 

Why doth they protest so much?  Just thirty posts in almost as many months? No presence on social media, certainly no commentary from me - why do I worry them so much?  Why are they trying to draw YOUR eye 'off the ball' and away from themselves?

I'll repeat the question I've effectively posed before...  How does raping a 9-year old girl, or inciting murder, or even a man trying to frame his own Daughter's Grandfather for a sex crime he did not commit, and that simply  wasn't committed; filling an innocent child's head with gross sexual fantasies that individual created in their own sick mind...

How do any of those things compare with anything in the normal range of transgressions an average person might or might not be guilty of? 

Now... I have nothing to say to those sickos out there seeking mere entertainment.

And despite the childish bullshit attempts to claim otherwise, the only place I post on this subject is right here where my name is on the bottom of the page. I'm simply not a part of the infantile, deluded world of the conspiretard...

But is it any wonder people do adopt aliases when  the risk is these perverts and criminals who are running so very fast and scared will stop at nothing, including stalking and harassing innocent teenagers to try and put the world off their scent... Or rather, their stench! 

The inescapable fact remains,  I'm not part of the conspiretard scene, not obsessing over forums or blog comments. Not seeking donations or selling books...

I'm not here to keep the virtual fishwives and wannabe detectives of the world wide web amused. - I'm simply not interested in silly wee games and 'showboating'...   If you're one of these wasters or wannabes I just wont give you the time of day. I'm just digging, digging, digging, silently away. The only people I'm liable to talk and pass information to are the Police.  And more and more, that does seem to scare the living shit out of certain individuals.

It's really very revealing when these 'birds of a feather' start flocking together...

In the past it's taken up to fifteen years to see some of these perverts banged up  where they belong. But then, the old cliques that used to protect them are being dismantled... It's worth the wait knowing these perverts spend every waking moment knowing their lives could change with a flicker of blue and a flash of the old Sillitoe at any moment.

It's just a pity the sentences are so short.