This blog mainly covers and archives some of the material surrounding the Hollie Greig case, and explores my own, properly researched position as a legitimate media professional who has spent years actually working to get to the truth of it... It's main purpose is to act as a public record of my position on the case. It's not a discussion forum, I'm not here to entertain or give the oxygen of publicity to nutters...

And, importantly, unlike others, this blog is not purposed to distract attention away from the Hollie Grieg case or obfuscate the issues surrounding child sexual abuse generally...

Also in stark contrast to many others is the fact that I'm not begging for cash. There is no mechanism for you to donate money to me. There are no books or DVDs you can buy from me on the Hollie Greig case... Nor for that matter any similar case.

I am not here to promote vapid conspiracy theories! - And glad to say that certain perverts who have crossed me in the past actually have gone to jail for their crimes against children.

And please note carefully, your approval of me or what I write is of no relevance or interest to me... I don't require your attention, I don't want your money and I have nothing - except reality - to promote here.

My only interest is in the truth of the case, and seeing those who abuse children brought to justice through the courts. And that does seem to scare certain people - mainly criminals and perverts - out of their wits...

What have they got to hide?

Tuesday, 17 May 2016

25. Another day, another stalker…


When you spend your days dealing with the subject matter I have to (and it's really not a choice I can tell you!), it can take you to some pretty dark places.   It draws the ire of some very disturbed individuals. - Lowlife sub-human garbage like the right-wing nutjob and fantasist Greg Lance-Watkins for instance.  Or scummy filth like Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy. Each as bad as the other... Festering scabs on society's arse; the lowest of the low. 

And when you get close to joining the dots, oh how they panic… How they wriggle! It's amazing the lengths they will go to. Especially when it can be seen that you are actually getting results and people are actually going to jail…  

Clearly they are rattled - for of what interest or relevance am I if I actually present no threat to their bizarre, perverted, hoaxing ways?  If I really am a nobody with nothing to say who know nothing - why are they running so scared?  

It's the amazing the effort that gets put in to discrediting this nobody. - Normally it's childish crap such as cryptic messages from 'Arthur Thompson'- a long dead Glasgow gangster; I guess they must mean something to the deranged infantile mind that sends them. But no one even opens them now...  A collection of silly little Facebook Fannies proving to the world what empty-headed wasters they really are... 

I don't bother with this rubbish personally. – It's part of an office junior's duties here to just delete it and block the senders. Only a very small proportion of these 'abnormal' messages are actually opened let alone forwarded to me. 

One arrived on my desk today though…

" – I could never confirm or deny if these allegations and things written ARE true, but you can bet your arse I’ve made my own mind up."  

And there's the level of logic that's at play...  A mind made-up without even attempting to gather the other side of the story, let alone work out what stands up and what doesn't. That, and a link to a publically attention-seeking diatribe filled with non-truths... Par for the course with these 'types'.

It seems that, as well as my own works email address being abused other members of my household were also targeted by this creepy stalker... Also at their work no less! - Which lends an altogether more 'manic' and disturbing aspect to this undignified and misguded display.

As  a family then we feel fully justified in making this a Police matter. The legislation that covers this is section 39 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 - A prosecution can be obtained on the basis of just two instances of harassment...    Of which we already have evidence.

For clarity, other harassment - originating from within England and Wales - falls under the Malicious Communications Act...   

I shan't publically explore much of the background of the unfortunate and apparently unwell young woman who today made the erroneous and very public claim to be my long-abandoned daughter.  She is no such thing, she's just not!  

She is another man's child. - Which, historically, was rather the problem!  

The fact that (as she admits) her dates don't 'add up' and she doesn't know 'who the hell Rathney is' indicates to me that in truth, she really doesn't really know who the hell I am either...  And that might not be entirely her fault.  But is it in anyone's interests – least of all her REAL father and mother's – that the truth behind this filthy laundry is aired in public?  Dragged through the mud? 

And why didn't she do some basic research? No attempt was made to contact me before she published this vicious tripe!  It would seem that this young lady has part of 'A' story… But of whose authorship exactly? She does seem to labour under various illusions.

I can tell her for instance that a baby born at six months term - that's three months premature - is likely to weigh between 0.4Kg and 1Kg. I can tell her that because of the memories of that horrific week where I sat watching the life slipping from my actual firstborn, who, being at the lower end of that range would literally have fitted in the palm of my hand...

Even today in the 21st century such a child, if it survived at all, would spend MONTHS in hospital before being allowed home...  I'm also reliably informed that such a child is likely to grow up with significant disabilities; not that this makes me mourn the death of my eldest daughter any less. 

The author of that diatribe however will have access to her own medical records, and I strongly suggest she checks them! Giving her the benefit of the doubt, she would seem to be gravely mistaken about the circumstances of her own birth. I strongly suspect that some time educating herself in medical science will confirm that those records of hers are entirely at odds with being a three-month early 'preemie' - as my firstborn was! 

Likewise - I've never given a story to the "Evening Times" or even spoken to them...

The Sunday Times (an altogether different publication) however did once, many years ago, run a 1½-page feature on me...  What the young lady describes as my "rags to riches" story...  It's hardly the latter though! I'm just a working man running the simple family business I and my wife have spent decades building up. 

Why does this attention-seeker want to make such an exhibition of herself?

It would appear that she's lived most of her life with her real Father and Mother, was brought up by them and that the experience was largely positive…  Why then does she want to drag themespecially her mother - through the trash?  And it IS trash! Much of which has already had to be aired in a court of law, which found in my favour

But that was a very long time ago... Decades ago...

Although it's very hard for me to garner anything other than contempt for the woman who once mislead me so badly, I do acknowledge that she has the right to move on in peace.  That she had the right to pull herself out the mire she had made for herself - which she seems to have done. And certainly neither she nor the young lady's real father are of any interest to me…   

There have been no 'issues' with them for in excess of 22 years! 

Of course, this tale suits the purposes of twisted excrement such as Greg Lance-Watkins - a dangerous right-wing nutcase. Him, or the drug-addled, too dangerous to be let near his own child,  Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy; both cast from the same die truly.

Both of these men are interested in taking YOUR eye off the ball and ensuring that the Hollie Greig case – and others like it – are parked firmly in 'la la land' along with all the other daft conspiracy stories…  Hidden in plain sight, both of them working hard to ensure the truth of that case is hidden. 

Watkins in particular has been outed irrefutably by me as an out-and-out fantasist… A man who fantasises about being 'spanked' by his old headmaster,  imagines himself in the shoes of Thomas Hamilton, endorses the murder of politicians and even has serious firearms convictions…  

Is it strange that an out-and-proud lesbian (as this young lady is) should align herself with well-known a rabid right-wing crank like Watkins who has been noted for his homophobia?  Or for that matter with the dangerous nutcase Ogilvy?  I do think so...   

What is the purpose of today's episode I wonder? To deflect attention away from what I might-next reveal in connection to the Hollie Greig case or the 'players' who were involved with it?  Or what I might reveal with respect to some other pervert? - It's certainly entirely in keeping with past-attempts with that agenda. And, as I've said, the one thing both sides on the extremes of the Hollie Greig case do seem to fear is the truth…

For her part, I do fear the young lady is exhibiting signs of some form of breakdown or mental instability; and that is very unfortunate. I do urge her to seek medical attention. 

But I am afraid she is labouring under a delusion if she thinks my daughter is any kind of  'little sister' to her. And I can advise her that today she has brought nothing but fear, distress and alarm to the girl!  This stalker's comments and approach today were found threatening and sinister – so much so that we have already alerted the police for her protection... 

The young lady would also do well to consider her own future which is in a forward-facing role at what I'll call a large national 'sales' organisation.  It seems she has built some sort of modest career for herself.  We might I think reasonably wonder what her bosses reaction will be if she is convicted of a offence involving online-harassment, stalking or otherwise breaching public order...   

She would also be well-advised to consider what impact the presence of today's  immature and irrational public ouburst will have on her future career!  For she has aligned herself with some of the most derranged cranks, criminals and fraudsters alive in Britain today... 

A bizarre parcel of rogues whose 'achievements' range from multi-million pound charity fraud through fantasising about being spies, forgery, the sexual abuse of children, drug-dealing and extreme right-wing politics including the endorsement of murder...  

By way of example I'd urge the young lady to research Greg Lance-Watkins' comments on the death of Anna Lindh. - Stabbed to death as she shopped in a high street store, Watkins thought her muder 'the act of a patriot'... The absolute scum of the earth and dregs of humanity! 

And now she's a poster-girl for a man who endorses murder and seems to wish he had walked in Thomas Hamilton's shoes...  Certainly no offspring of mine would align themselves with sewage like that.

I do sincerely hope she gets the medical attention she apparently needs…  But either way I'm sorry miss, but I am really NOT your father! I believe you were actually brought up by him.  And should perhaps have a little more respect for the man in that regard - he really is the 'daddy', not me...

Monday, 11 January 2016

24. Greg Lance Watkins… As big an idiot and liar as ever.



A couple of things have been brought to my attention today which warrant public comment... 

Firstly... IF you have arrived here via comments on the Aangirfan blog please be aware that these have absolutely NOTHING to do with me!   If I post anywhere I shall do so in my own name!  - It was something of a feature of the time when I was commenting on the Hollie Greig case that various 'impersonators' would pop up here and there...  And this crap seems to go on and on and on...  

In case it has escaped your notice I am NOT a fan of the 'conspiracy scene', and have no interest in the smoke these people blow. I do not, in general, concern myself with the blogs these people write or the forums they hang out in! You will not find me using FaceBook - which I regard as dangerously infantile - nor am I in the slightest bit impressed with all the hocus pocus crap about numerology, space aliens, weird illuminati cults or any other such stupidly-childish bollocks! 

Secondly...  Brought to my attention today is this load of old crap from Greg Lance-Watkins.  – Presumably in response to a recent visit paid to him by officers of the law…  


This sad, dishonest,blethering fool attempts to attack the business interests that have fed and clothed me and my family for some thirty years on the basis of a couple of dormant 'shell' companies I keep for legal reasons...

It's interesting that the equally-disreputable convicted criminal  Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy should be so very very keen to align himself with Greg Lance-Watkins... Birds of a feather I guess!  

Factually Greg Lance-Watkins is an unhinged attention-seeking ghoul who has variously endorsed the slaughter of an innocent woman in the street, been convicted of SERIOUS firearms offences and once-boasted of a chilling pre-echo of the Dunblane tragedy in which he himself entered his own old primary school with the intent of murdering his former headmaster; a Mr Butters...  To speak of but a few examples of his lunacy! 

Of this pre echo there is, it seems, some indication that it might be true!  

However, lets suppose that like much of the pish spouted by Greg Lance-Watkins it's just a 'STORY' he made up to aggrandise himself...  Imagine what sort of sick, perverted mind might fantasise about being - in effect - Thomas Hamilton!  And elsewhere in the same sordid tale expose their fantasy that they were previously 'spanked by the Headmaster' in a sexualised way! 

- This is the reality of Greg Lance-Watkins' world! The man truly is a joke!

We can understand why the workshy waster Ogilvy knows nothing about business structures. But apparently, wallowing in ignorance as he does, the 'great business mind' Watkins doesn't understand what a shell company is, or why one might use one when handling IP rights.  – Or why (for instance) such a company might be kept dormant or why it might owe the people who actually own it money. 

Yup! I personally am owed three grand by a company that I and my wife wholly own, and I have another (kept dormant) shell company set up to protect the particular Intellectual Property of a trading name that I've had in use for almost 30 years… Which almost got 'nicked' at one time.  

So what?   - As a self-employed  SOLE TRADER my business affairs are entirely private and not published to the public. - The shell companies are separate legal entities the main purpose of which is to act as a 'buffer' in the event we have to sue a third party in respect of our intellectual properties. 

So much for Greggy the great business guru who can, factually, be directly linked to some of the dodgiest con-artists around…    

It's interesting too that Watkins seeks to make further character assassination based on the fact that I was indeed abandoned by my father as a child and didn't track the man down 'till I was in my 30s...  And in reproducing a post from 1997 – almost two decades ago – when I was seeking contact with my own estranged Father;  Watkins' sheer inhumanity, his psychopathy, shines like a beacon! 

What kind of sick and perverted mind would project blame or try to make capital, let alone mock someone who as a child had the misfortune to be raised fatherless? - The same sort of dirty-filthy-racist-cunt-of-hell who previously 'danced on the graves' of both my late fiancé and the three-month-premature child we had that only lived for six days... 

Similarly Watkins drags up a newspaper report from 1999 – very dishonestly misrepresenting it as if it were recent – surrounding what was actually one of the very first independent online exposés made in Britain…  The truth? Well we have to rewind a little for that!

It's been an interesting year in the real world. -The place where real people are really concerned about protecting kids from child abusers. 

2015 was the year that saw another old Nemesis – Hugh Mitchell - finally caught and caged; some seventeen years after I brought him to the attention of Lothian and Borders Police who, it would appear, did exactly nothing with the information I gave them…   

Mitchell - a former army intelligence officer - went on to continue his career as a paedophile; he raped a number of young girls and even authored a book and produced videos on the subject of his sick exploits...

What was his market you might wonder! 

Readers will recall that I have long suggested that there are links between the men most-likely to have abused Hollie Greig and the extreme pornography 'industry'. It's known that one of them (like Mitchell) had a collection of obsolete but still serviceable video equipment - there being no requirement among these perverts to produce their filth to EBU standards!  

The pervert 'community' being small how likely is it that there were direct links between beasts like those who abused Hollie and the likes of Hugh Mitchell?  And through what network did they distribute their vile filth?  What kind of animal woud be in a position to provide a 'front' for some piece of scum to walk in off the street and purchase copies of such sick material?  

Having apparently ignored the concerns I raised about Mitchell the very same force - Lothian and Borders - took a similar tack the following year (1999) when I exposed open crime and disorder – including paedophilic behaviour – taking place on the streets of a West Lothian Village called Addiewell; a place that was later proved to be one of the regular 'haunts' of one Ian Samson. - A beast who, in August 2013 was jailed for 14 years for catalogue of sexual offences against children carried out over three decades.

On that occasion not only did the police AGAIN substantially ignore our concerns; but my family and I were 'thrown to the wolves' by police, politicians and local council alike. 

As an aside here... Readers of the Aangirfan blog may care to note that Angela Constance was one such politician; being as she is actually from that village and represented it on what in my opinion is one of the most corrupt councils in Great Britain...   Personally I have no faith or confidence in the woman (largely because of the way she acted towards us over Addiewell) and think her entirely unsuited to investigating such matters. - And you may take that from a dyed-in-the-wool supporter of Scottish independence  who exposed the "First Minister in missing records" lie...

For the 'sin' of exposing crime, and disorder, and concern over 12-year-old girls being plied with drink and groped in the street by grown men; life was made 'uncomfortable' to the extent I could not leave my wife and young child unprotected; and was effectively put out of work for some eighteen months.  The experience cost us tens-of-thousands of pounds as (among other things) multiple cars were wrecked in the street and we were eventually forced to flee what was supposed to be our home. 

But the odd thing about all that is that we were 'attacked' by the local thugs even before we moved into that place… Before anyone could possibly have had a clue who I am or what I am about… Not by any 'natural' means at least.

On the very first day I took possession of the house, and had gone up to the place to measure up; I returned to my van to find it had two tyres let down and the words "we were ere b4 u" (slightly unusual in pre text-speak days) written in the dust on its bonnet…  'Kids playing gangsters' I thought at the time! – I was wrong! For these criminals were very serious and very vicious. To the extent our lives were put at real risk.  

I have often wondered over the years… Was there a direct connection between Hugh Mitchell and Ian Samson that caused the latter (who really was quite a nasty low-life type thug) to instigate a panicked campaign to get me out of an area where high levels of organised paedophilia and criminality were the norm?  - The common thread of course being that they were both members of the 'Paedophile scene'. And there can be little serious doubt that as a producer of paedophile pornography, Mitchell and him moved in the very same circles... 

A simple question therefore arises when we consider the unity between vermin like Malcolm Konrad Ogilvy and Greg Lance-Watkins...  Their joint 'Queen Gertrude Act'... Birds of a Feather...  

What is their joint agenda?  Who or what exactly is it they are trying to draw attention away from? 

As I've had to point out many times, this blog does not exist to merely regurgitate existing reports and weave them into fanciful sectarian/politico/right-wing fantasises...    Nor am I in the 'conspiritainment' industry...  Rattling the tins for donations from the ignorant and the rudderless...

If and when I do uncover information that might lead to the arrest and conviction of a pervert I take that information to the proper authorities. I have no concern for 'the scoop' or making money out of these things...  And I'm more than happy to maintain absolute silence while the police get on with their job...

You see, it's not actually my place to go kicking doors down... Figuratively or otherwise. Vigilantism serves no legitimate purpose, and is more likely to grant an escape-route to an offender than serve the ends of justice...

And I suspect that's what dysfunctional, criminal perverts fear...     

Information going through the proper channels and reaching a genuine court of law in the appropriate way is likely to result in actual convictions.  Whereas the pervert's preference is to parade key information through online kangaroo courts - which ultimately leads to the argument that a fair trial cannot be lawfully obtained.  - Thus defeating the ends of justice.

It's amusing to note how keen they are to discredit me, and how vacuous their attempts to do so actually are. - After all, if I really am a nobody who knows nothing, what possible threat can I be?  

Queen Gertrude walks again!  


********

Monday, 2 November 2015

23. How many others?


There can be few greater joys in life for a man than to have his loving family about him… I counted my blessings as I sat last night in my living-room with my wife of 23 years, and our nineteen year old daughter contentedly watching television with the cat on her lap… A happy, healthy young woman who has grown up in a stable home with supportive parents that worked hard to keep her at a good school… As usual I ran her to her place at one of Scotland's top universities today. Hail and hearty; she's had a sheltered upbringing and I hope she never has to deal with many of the world's horrors. 


Mark McGivern has ascribed the names 'Karen' and 'Jenny' to Mitchell's victims – not their real names of course because as the victim of a sex crime they are of course entitled to lifelong anonymity… 

"Karen’s life is blighted by flashbacks to the abuse she endured and she has even attempted suicide." 

Heartbreaking!  Just heartbreaking…  And how many others?  'Respectable' Mitch Mitchell with his shiny new cars, frequent trips abroad, avid dog lover, keen canoeist, former serviceman… How many other lives and families has he wrecked?

What if I'd never caught on to Mitchell? - That could very easily have been my own daughter…  

There but for the grace of God!  And I'm thankful to him for causing me to pick up the signs surrounding Mitch Mitchell and sacking him from the RSL project when I did.  As Daily Record Journalist, Mark McGivern burrows into this case the horror just seems to get worse and worse…

And for the record (no pun intended) and in response to emails I've received today – Mark McGivern or anyone else with a legitimate interest in seeing to it that The Kirknewton Nonce and his Moll are exposed, is free to pick over the bones of the information I've 'put out there' without further reference to me…  I require no attention or acknowledgement.  – In fact obscurity is a very good place from which to carry out this type of work…

"Jenny was aged between eight and 11 when he volunteered to take her for swimming lessons and on drives in a country park between 1996 and 2000.


He also locked her in the bedroom of his former Army home in Kirknewton, West Lothian , where he undressed her and filmed her – as he did other victims – using advanced video equipment from his job as a cameraman."


Jenny, whose parents lived south of the Border but frequently visited the Mitchells, said she was disturbed to hear from other victims that her own abuse continued after the whistle was blown in 1998."


"'SHE [Gill Mitchell] didn't seem too surprised to hear he was a paedophile,' says the father, who is sure Hugh Mitchell's wife Gill knew about her husband's crimes."

No, I suspect she wasn't at all surprised…  

"The dad said: 'I knocked on the door and he let me in. He was downstairs and she was upstairs. I told him I knew what he had done and he admitted it.'

Then, the dad recalled, Gill Mitchell was drawn into the confrontation, with a reaction that horrified him. He said: “She came down the stairs saying, ‘Not the girls, please not the girls.’ I’ll never forget it."

Again… It can't possibly have been a surprise!  

Mitchell had after all previously lost his job at a West Lothian School because he was leching at the little girls there…  And I'm unsure whether this incident preceded my firing him from the West Lothian TV project in April or May of 1998, precisely because I had become upset and concerned by his behaviour…  So concerned that I had reported my suspicions to Lothian and Borders Police…

Did the Police ever pay him a visit I wonder?  And did Gill Mitchell also cover for him then? Is it possible the Police took the matter no further simply because the Mitchells presented a united - and apparently respectable - front?

" Karen said her father had come home and told the family about what happened at Mitchell’s house.

She said: “I was terrified because I thought he would kill him. He had trusted Mitchell with us and he just seemed like the perfect family friend.

“My dad came back and when he talked about it later he was very specific about what happened. He was very firm about Gill Mitchell coming down the stairs and saying, ‘Not the girls’.


“I found it the weirdest thing to say. I took it she half-expected to be hearing he was a pervert but she’d rather it hadn’t happened to girls she knew.


“All contact between my parents and the Mitchells ended. If Gill Mitchell was oblivious to what he had done, would she really have accepted that?'"

It's unfortunate, though perfectly understandable, that 'Karen's' father did not go to the Police. And I for one will tolerate no pervert-apologist trying to deflect and project guilt onto the man!  He took that decision to protect his daughters from the trauma of a trial; and I don't blame him.  After all, accounts exist where toddlers have been subjected to the cruellest of cross-examination by defence lawyers acting on behalf of perverts... 

But it is sickening that Gill Mitchell herself did not expose her web-footed (yes, really!) perverted freak of a spouse… 
 
"Not the girls, please not the girls." Gill bleated...

As if the gravity of this beast's crimes were in any way impacted by exactly which girls her inhuman monster of a husband had sated his vile wants upon!  - As I have pointed out previously, if I'd not caught onto Mitchell when I did my own daughter could very well have become one of his victims.  - What of the other girls in the village? Those of his neigbours? Those in the local park where was often to be seen walking his dogs

Karen said…

“I think Mitchell got off lightly. He should never be allowed out of jail because he will never stop being a danger to young girls."

I fear the young lady is right.  And I suspect many other victims of Hugh Mitchell are yet to emerge.  And on that basis I would plead with them to go to the Police now.  For each additional conviction should extend Mitchell's sentence; and ensure that he never breathes to cool clean air of freedom again.

There must be a God…  And I'm thankful to him for causing me to pick up the signs surrounding Mitch Mitchell when I did.  But I remain angry…

Angry at Lothian and Borders Police for apparently doing nothing with the information I passed to them…


Angry at the school he worked in for sweeping his perversion under the carpet…


And Angry at Gill Mitchell MBE… Not, by any measure any kind of "victim" in this…


As a resident of the same village in which Mitchell carried out his horrendous crimes I can tell you that his wife still struts around the place as if she owns it... Walking her dogs without a care in the world, and her MBE no doubt tucked safely away to remind her of what a 'special' lady she is...  A neck of pure brass!

An affront to the girls her husband was convicted of abusing, and an affront to the victims that are no-doubt still to come forward, whom the snotty cow would appear to imagine are lesser beings not worthy of her concern... 

What's to be done? What can be done?

YOU, personally, today, - no matter where you live in the UK can do something real to take a stand against establishment-endorsed child abuse in your country....   
YOU can do it quietly and modestly and without seeking attention…

YOU can lodge a formal complaint as to the conduct of Mrs Gillian Barbara Mitchell MBE of Churchill Way Kirknewton, EH27 8AW - Pointing out that her conduct in shielding her paedophile husband disgraces the honours system, and asking that she be stripped of her MBE.

Please consider what I have written here.  – And please do consider writing to the Honours Forfeiture Committee at:

The Honours Forfeiture Committee
The Cabinet Office
70 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2AS

It IS far better to do these things by post - preferably recorded delivery -for you are entitled to a response, and having to respond to a number of individual letters will tend to catch their eye...  But you may also lodge your complaints by Email to:

publiccorrespondence@cabinetoffice.gov.uk